Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractThe Biological Diversity and Production of Volatile Organic Compounds by Stem-Inhabiting Endophytic Fungi of Ecuador    Next AbstractConstitutive and Induced Defenses in Long-lived Pines Do Not Trade Off but Are Influenced by Climate »

Ann Work Expo Health


Title:Exploring Methods for Surveillance of Occupational Exposure from Additive Manufacturing in Four Different Industrial Facilities
Author(s):Runstrom Eden G; Tinnerberg H; Rosell L; Moller R; Almstrand AC; Bredberg A;
Address:"University of Gothenburg, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden. RISE, Research Institutes of Sweden, Gothenburg, Sweden"
Journal Title:Ann Work Expo Health
Year:2022
Volume:66
Issue:2
Page Number:163 - 177
DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxab070
ISSN/ISBN:2398-7316 (Electronic) 2398-7308 (Print) 2398-7308 (Linking)
Abstract:"3D printing, a type of additive manufacturing (AM), is a rapidly expanding field. Some adverse health effects have been associated with exposure to printing emissions, which makes occupational exposure studies important. There is a lack of exposure studies, particularly from printing methods other than material extrusion (ME). The presented study aimed to evaluate measurement methods for exposure assessment in AM environments and to measure exposure and emissions from four different printing methods [powder bed fusion (PBF), material extrusion (ME), material jetting (MJ), and vat photopolymerization] in industry. Structured exposure diaries and volatile organic compound (VOC) sensors were used over a 5-day working week. Personal and stationary VOC samples and real-time particle measurements were taken for 1 day per facility. Personal inhalable and respirable dust samples were taken during PBF and MJ AM. The use of structured exposure diaries in combination with measurement data revealed that comparatively little time is spent on actual printing and the main exposure comes from post-processing tasks. VOC and particle instruments that log for a longer period are a useful tool as they facilitate the identification of work tasks with high emissions, highlight the importance of ventilation and give a more gathered view of variations in exposure. No alarming levels of VOCs or dust were detected during print nor post-processing in these facilities as adequate preventive measures were installed. As there are a few studies reporting negative health effects, it is still important to keep the exposure as low as reasonable"
Keywords:Dust/analysis Humans Manufacturing and Industrial Facilities *Occupational Exposure Ventilation *Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis 3D printing Voc additive manufacturing diary exposure industry material extrusion material jetting occupational particles;
Notes:"MedlineRunstrom Eden, Gunilla Tinnerberg, Hakan Rosell, Lars Moller, Rickie Almstrand, Ann-Charlotte Bredberg, Anna eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2021/09/07 Ann Work Expo Health. 2022 Feb 18; 66(2):163-177. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxab070"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 23-09-2024