Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractCOVID-19 lockdown: Effects on selected volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions over the major Indian metro cities    Next AbstractCharacterisation of the Alarm Pheromone of Bathycoelia Distincta (Pentatomidae) »

Anal Chim Acta


Title:Diffusion-based humidity control membrane for microfluidic-based gas detectors
Author(s):Paknahad M; Bachhal JS; Hoorfar M;
Address:"University of British Columbia, School of Engineering, Kelowna, Canada. University of British Columbia, School of Engineering, Kelowna, Canada. Electronic address: mina.hoorfar@ubc.ca"
Journal Title:Anal Chim Acta
Year:2018
Volume:20180330
Issue:
Page Number:103 - 112
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.03.021
ISSN/ISBN:1873-4324 (Electronic) 0003-2670 (Linking)
Abstract:"This paper presents a cost-effective and reliable diffusion-based humidity removal membrane for microfluidic-based gas analyzers. The developed humidity control device reduces the relative humidity of a gas chamber and also stabilizes the humidity using inexpensive inorganic salts. A 3D-printed microfluidic gas sensor is used to test four different volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including three alcohols and one ketone in different relative humidity levels ranging from 15% to 80%. To study the effects of humidity on different features of the transient response of the sensor, two different feature extraction methods are used. These methods are (i) normalization method, removing the effect of any changes in the response level for identifying the nature of the gas, and (ii) integration method, which differentiates between different response levels due to different concentrations or humidity levels. The results show that the sensor fails to differentiate between different VOCs or even between different concentrations of the same gas when there is a slight change (as small as 5%) in humidity. In essence, the device is vulnerable to the errors occur due to the presence of humidity even after the post processing analysis (feature extraction). Thus, a humidity control and removal membrane is developed in order to minimize the effect of humidity. The selectivity of the sensor with and without the use of the humidity removal membrane is compared and shown to be 36% more in the case of utilizing the humidity removal membrane. The proposed humidity control system successfully removes the effect of humidity on the response pattern of the sensor and can be used for different applications such as breath analyzers for which lowering the level of humidity of the exhaled breath is crucial before analyzing the VOCs of interest"
Keywords:Feature extraction Gas sensor Humidity control Microfluidic-based gas analyzer Voaltile organic compound;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEPaknahad, Mohammad Bachhal, Jannat Singh Hoorfar, Mina eng Netherlands 2018/04/24 Anal Chim Acta. 2018 Aug 27; 1021:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Mar 30"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-06-2024