Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractModality-specific impairment of learning by a neonicotinoid pesticide    Next AbstractThe cell aggregating propensity of probiotic actinobacterial isolates: isolation and characterization of the aggregation inducing peptide pheromone »

R Soc Open Sci


Title:No evidence for neonicotinoid preferences in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens
Author(s):Muth F; Gaxiola RL; Leonard AS;
Address:"Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, TX 78712, USA. School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 99164, USA. Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA"
Journal Title:R Soc Open Sci
Year:2020
Volume:20200520
Issue:5
Page Number:191883 -
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191883
ISSN/ISBN:2054-5703 (Print) 2054-5703 (Electronic) 2054-5703 (Linking)
Abstract:"Neonicotinoid pesticides can have a multitude of negative sublethal effects on bees. Understanding their impact on wild populations requires accurately estimating the dosages bees encounter under natural conditions. This is complicated by the possibility that bees might influence their own exposure: two recent studies found that bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) preferentially consumed neonicotinoid-contaminated nectar, even though these chemicals are thought to be tasteless and odourless. Here, we used Bombus impatiens to explore two elements of these reported preferences, with the aim of understanding their ecological implication and underlying mechanism. First, we asked whether preferences persisted across a range of realistic nectar sugar concentrations, when measured at a series of time points up until 24 h. Second, we tested whether bees' neonicotinoid preferences were driven by an ability to associate their post-ingestive consequences with floral stimuli such as colour, location or scent. We found no evidence that foragers preferred to consume neonicotinoid-containing solutions, despite finding effects on feeding motivation and locomotor activity in line with previous work. Bees also did not preferentially visit floral stimuli previously paired with a neonicotinoid-containing solution. These results highlight the need for further research into the mechanisms underlying bees' responses to these pesticides, critical for determining how neonicotinoid-driven foraging preferences might operate in the real world for different bee species"
Keywords:activity bee behaviour imidacloprid learning locomotor;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEMuth, Felicity Gaxiola, Rebekah L Leonard, Anne S eng England 2020/06/17 R Soc Open Sci. 2020 May 20; 7(5):191883. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191883. eCollection 2020 May"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-12-2024