Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Apple ermine moth,Yponomeuta malinellus Zeller Two components of female sex pheromone gland highly effective in field trapping tests"    Next Abstract"Codling moth,Cydia pomonella, (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): Is its sex pheromone multicomponent?" »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Codling moth (Cydia pomonella): Disruptants of sex pheromonal communication
Author(s):McDonough LM; Davis HG; Chapman PS; Smithhisler CL;
Address:"USDA, Agricultural Research Service, 3706 W. Nob Hill Blvd., 98902, Yakima, Washington"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:1994
Volume:20
Issue:1
Page Number:171 - 181
DOI: 10.1007/BF02065999
ISSN/ISBN:0098-0331 (Print) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"In a small section of an apple orchard, six traps were placed each in control and test areas and baited with live virgin female codling moths. Gray elastomer septa were used to dispense communication disruptants around the traps. Dyed male codling moths were released in control and test areas, and the numbers of males captured in control and test traps were compared. In 1991, linear regression curves of percent communication disruption versus logarithm of dose were obtained for three compositions: (E,E)-8,10-dodecadien-1-ol, codlemone (1); codlemone + dodecan-1-ol + tetradecan-1-ol (2); and an equilibrium mixture of the four isomers of 8,10-dodecadien-1-ol (30, (61%EE, 14%ZE, 20%EZ, and 5%ZZ). All three regressions gaver (2) values greater than 0.90. At the 95% confidence limits, slopes and intercepts of compositions 1 and 2 were equivalent, and different from that of composition 3, which produced the greatest percentages of disruption at all doses. In 1992, five treatments were compared at a single dose: 1, 3, none (4), (Z,E)-8,10-dodecadien-1-ol (5), (E,Z)-8,10-dodecadien-1-ol (6). Compositions 5 and 6 gave the greatest and similar percentages of disruption and were different from codlemone (1) and 4 (95% confidence), but not from composition 3. Communication disruption produced by composition 3 was greater than (codlemone), which was greater than 4"
Keywords:
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEMcDonough, L M Davis, H G Chapman, P S Smithhisler, C L eng 1994/01/01 J Chem Ecol. 1994 Jan; 20(1):171-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02065999"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024