Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractChallenges in quantitative analyses for volatile organic compounds bound to lipocalins    Next AbstractChanges in volatile compounds of human urine as it ages: their interaction with water »

Physiol Behav


Title:Differential binding between volatile ligands and major urinary proteins due to genetic variation in mice
Author(s):Kwak J; Grigsby CC; Rizki MM; Preti G; Koksal M; Josue J; Yamazaki K; Beauchamp GK;
Address:"Monell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. jkwak@monell.org"
Journal Title:Physiol Behav
Year:2012
Volume:20120620
Issue:1
Page Number:112 - 120
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.06.008
ISSN/ISBN:1873-507X (Electronic) 0031-9384 (Linking)
Abstract:"Two different structural classes of chemical signals in mouse urine, i.e., volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and the major urinary proteins (MUPs), interact closely because MUPs sequester VOCs. Although qualitative and/or quantitative differences in each chemical class have been reported, previous studies have examined only one of the classes at a time. No study has analyzed these two sets simultaneously, and consequently binding interactions between volatile ligands and proteins in urines of different strains have not been compared. Here, we compared the release of VOCs in male urines of three different inbred strains (C57BL/6J, BALB/b and AKR) before and after denaturation of urinary proteins, mainly MUPs. Both MUP and VOC profiles were distinctive in the intact urine of each strain. Upon denaturation, each of the VOC profiles changed due to the release of ligands previously bound to MUPs. The results indicate that large amounts of numerous ligands are bound to MUPs and that these ligands represent a variety of different structural classes of VOCs. Furthermore, the degree of release in each ligand was different in each strain, indicating that different ligands are differentially bound to proteins in the urines of different strains. Therefore, these data suggest that binding interactions in ligands and MUPs differ between strains, adding yet another layer of complexity to chemical communication in mice"
Keywords:"Animals Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods Genetic Variation/*genetics Isoelectric Focusing Ligands Mice Mice, Inbred AKR Mice, Inbred BALB C Mice, Inbred C57BL Principal Component Analysis Protein Binding/genetics Proteins/*genetics/*metabolism;"
Notes:"MedlineKwak, Jae Grigsby, Claude C Rizki, Mateen M Preti, George Koksal, Mustafa Josue, Jesusa Yamazaki, Kunio Beauchamp, Gary K eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 2012/06/26 Physiol Behav. 2012 Aug 20; 107(1):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jun 20"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024