Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Analysis of glycols, glycol ethers, and other volatile organic compounds present in household water-based hand pump sprays"    Next AbstractMolecular characterization of a moss isoprene synthase provides insight into its evolution »

J Toxicol Sci


Title:Evaluation of the sensitization potential of volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds using the direct peptide reactivity assay
Author(s):Kawakami T; Isama K; Ikarashi Y; Jinno H;
Address:"Division of Environmental Chemistry, National Institute of Health Sciences. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Teikyo Heisei University. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Meijo University"
Journal Title:J Toxicol Sci
Year:2020
Volume:45
Issue:11
Page Number:725 - 735
DOI: 10.2131/jts.45.725
ISSN/ISBN:1880-3989 (Electronic) 0388-1350 (Linking)
Abstract:"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitization potential of 82 compounds classified as volatile and/or semi-volatile organic compounds using the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), given that these chemical compounds have been detected frequently and at high concentrations in a national survey of Japanese indoor air pollution and other studies. The skin sensitization potential of 81 of these compounds was evaluable in our study; one compound co-eluted with cysteine peptide and was therefore not evaluable. Twenty-five of the evaluated compounds were classified as positive. Although all glycols and plasticizers detected frequently and at high concentrations in a national survey of Japanese indoor air pollution were negative, hexanal and nonanal, which are found in fragrances and building materials, tested positive. Monoethanolamine and 1,3-butanediol, which cause clinical contact dermatitis, and several compounds reported to have weak sensitization potential in animal studies, were classified as negative. Thus, it was considered that compounds with weak sensitization potential were evaluated as negative in the DPRA. Although the sensitization potential of the formaldehyde-releasing preservative bronopol has been attributed to the release of formaldehyde (a well-known contact allergen) by its degradation, its degradation products-bromonitromethane and 2-bromoethanol-were classified as positive, indicating that these degradation products also exhibit sensitization potential. The compounds that tested positive in this study should be comprehensively assessed through multiple toxicity and epidemiological studies"
Keywords:"Air Pollution, Indoor/*analysis Aldehydes Animals Biodegradation, Environmental Dermatitis, Contact/etiology Formaldehyde Glycolates Humans Japan Odorants Peptides Plasticizers Skin Skin Irritancy Tests/*methods Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis/classi;"
Notes:"MedlineKawakami, Tsuyoshi Isama, Kazuo Ikarashi, Yoshiaki Jinno, Hideto eng Japan 2020/11/03 J Toxicol Sci. 2020; 45(11):725-735. doi: 10.2131/jts.45.725"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024