Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDifferential Requirement for the Cell Wall Integrity Sensor Wsc1p in Diploids Versus Haploids    Next Abstract"Identification of components of male-produced pheromone of coffee white stemborer, Xylotrechus quadripes" »

J Econ Entomol


Title:Field comparison of chemical attractants and traps for Caribbean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Florida citrus
Author(s):Hall DG; Burns RE; Jenkins CC; Hibbard KL; Harris DL; Sivinski JM; Nigg HN;
Address:"USDA-ARS, 2001 South Rock Rd., Ft Pierce, FL 34945, USA"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2005
Volume:98
Issue:5
Page Number:1641 - 1647
DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-98.5.1641
ISSN/ISBN:0022-0493 (Print) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"Field studies in citrus were conducted to compare the following as attractants for the Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew): torula yeast-borax; propylene glycol (10%); a two-component lure consisting of ammonium acetate and putrescine; a two-component lure consisting of ammonium bicarbonate and putrescine; and a three-component lure consisting of ammonium bicarbonate, methylamine hydrochloride, and putrescine. Various combinations of these attractants in glass McPhail, plastic McPhail-type (Multi-Lure), and sticky panel traps were investigated in two replicated studies. In one study on wild flies, the most effective and least complex trap-lure combination tested was the Multi-Lure with propylene glycol baited with ammonium acetate and putrescine. This trap-lure combination captured significantly more female and male flies than the standard glass McPhail baited with torula yeast-borax in water. All of the trap-lure combinations were female biased, with an overall average of 80.8% (SEM 1.4) flies captured being female. A second study on laboratory-reared, irradiated flies indicated no significant differences among these trap-lure combinations with respect to number of flies recaptured, although rankings based on mean number of flies recovered per trap per day supported results of the first study. The percentage of flies recaptured that were female (83.0%, SEM 0.9) was statistically the same as in the first study. Weekly percentage recovery of flies during the second study was low, possibly due to our fly release strategy. Future release/recovery studies with laboratory-reared flies would benefit from some basic research on release strategies by using different trap densities and on relating recapture rates of laboratory-reared flies (nonsterile and sterile) to capture rates of wild flies"
Keywords:"Animals *Citrus Female Fertility Florida Insect Control/instrumentation/*methods Male Pest Control, Biological *Pheromones *Tephritidae;"
Notes:"MedlineHall, D G Burns, R E Jenkins, C C Hibbard, K L Harris, D L Sivinski, J M Nigg, H N eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2005/12/13 J Econ Entomol. 2005 Oct; 98(5):1641-7. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-98.5.1641"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024