Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractShared and differential traits in the accessory olfactory bulb of caviomorph rodents with particular reference to the semiaquatic capybara    Next Abstract"Sequential oxonium-olefin-alkyne cyclization for the stereoselective synthesis of (octahydro-1H-pyrano[3,4-c]pyridin-5-yl)methanone derivatives" »

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis


Title:The potential of volatile organic compounds-based breath analysis for COVID-19 screening: a systematic review & meta-analysis
Author(s):Subali AD; Wiyono L; Yusuf M; Zaky MFA;
Address:"Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, East Java, Indonesia. Electronic address: anitadominiquesubali@gmail.com. Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, East Java, Indonesia"
Journal Title:Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis
Year:2022
Volume:20211030
Issue:2
Page Number:115589 -
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115589
ISSN/ISBN:1879-0070 (Electronic) 0732-8893 (Print) 0732-8893 (Linking)
Abstract:"COVID-19 is a major problem with an increasing incidence and mortality. The discovery of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) based on breath analysis offers a reliable, rapid, and affordable screening method. This study examined VOC-based breath analysis diagnostic performance for SARS-COV-2 infection compared to RT-PCR. A systematic review was conducted in 8 scientific databases based on the PRISMA guideline. Original English studies evaluating human breaths for COVID-19 screening and mentioning sensitivity and specificity value compared to RT-PCR were included. Six studies were included with a total of 4093 samples from various settings. VOCs-based breath analysis had the cumulative sensitivity of 98.2% (97.5% CI 93.1%-99.6%) and specificity of 74.3% (97.5% CI 66.4%-80.9%). Subgroup analysis on chemical analysis (GC-MS) and pattern recognition (eNose) revealed higher sensitivity in the eNose group. VOC-based breath analysis shows high sensitivity and promising specificity for COVID-19 public screening"
Keywords:"Breath Tests/*methods COVID-19/*diagnosis Electronic Nose *Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Humans Mass Screening/methods SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification Sensitivity and Specificity Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis COVID-19, screening, diagnos;"
Notes:"MedlineSubali, Anita Dominique Wiyono, Lowilius Yusuf, Muhammad Zaky, Muhammad Fathi Athallah eng Meta-Analysis Systematic Review 2021/12/09 Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Feb; 102(2):115589. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115589. Epub 2021 Oct 30"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024