| Title: | Reducing mosquito-borne disease transmission to humans: A systematic review of cluster randomised controlled studies that assess interventions other than non-targeted insecticide |
| Author(s): | Oliver J; Larsen S; Stinear TP; Hoffmann A; Crouch S; Gibney KB; |
| Address: | "The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Pest and Environmental Adaptation Research Group, Bio21 Institute and the School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Department of Health, Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, Melbourne, Australia. Melbourne Health,Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Melbourne, Australia" |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009601 |
| ISSN/ISBN: | 1935-2735 (Electronic) 1935-2727 (Print) 1935-2727 (Linking) |
| Abstract: | "BACKGROUND: Mosquito control interventions are widely used to reduce mosquito-borne diseases. It is unclear what combination of interventions are most effective in reducing human disease. A novel intervention study for Buruli ulcer targeting mosquito vectors was proposed for a Buruli ulcer-endemic area of Victoria, Australia. The local community expressed a preference for avoiding widespread residual spraying of pyrethroids. To inform the design of a future cluster randomised control study (cRCT) for Buruli ulcer prevention in Victoria, we conducted a systematic literature review. AIMS: The aim was to describe cRCT designs which investigated interventions other than non-targeted insecticide for reducing mosquito-borne disease transmission, and comment on the strengths and weaknesses of these study designs. METHODS: Five medical research databases were searched for eligible literature from the earliest available sources up to 5 July 2019 (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, EBM Reviews, CAB Direct). Reference lists of identified studies were hand searched. Eligible studies were cRCTs using targeted chemical or biological mosquito control interventions, or mosquito breeding source reduction, with the occurrence of mosquito-borne disease as an outcome. RESULTS: Eight eligible cRCTs, conducted between 1994-2013 were identified in a variety of settings in the Americas and Asia. Interventions to reduce dengue transmission were mass adult trapping and source reduction. Interventions to reduce malaria transmission were largescale larvicide administration and (topical and spatial) repellent use. Three studies showed the intervention was associated with statistically significant reductions in the disease of interest and entomological indicators. High community engagement with the intervention were common to all three. In two studies, large buffer zones reduced contamination between study arms. Heterogeneity was reduced through increasing study cluster numbers, cluster matching and randomisation. CONCLUSION: High community engagement is vital for a cRCT reducing mosquito-borne disease with a mosquito control intervention. These findings support a mosquito breeding source reduction intervention for Aedes control in a future study of Buruli ulcer prevention if local communities are supportive and very engaged. Regular administration of larvicide to sites unsuited to source reduction may supplement the intervention" |
| Keywords: | Animals Humans *Culicidae/drug effects *Insecticides/pharmacology *Mosquito Control/methods *Mosquito Vectors/drug effects Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; |
| Notes: | "MedlineOliver, Jane Larsen, Stuart Stinear, Tim P Hoffmann, Ary Crouch, Simon Gibney, Katherine B eng Systematic Review 2021/07/30 PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Jul 29; 15(7):e0009601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009601. eCollection 2021 Jul" |
