Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractA macroglomerulus in the antennal lobe of leaf-cutting ant workers and its possible functional significance    Next AbstractHanseniaspora uvarum Attracts Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) With High Specificity »

Brain Behav


Title:FMRI activation to cannabis odor cues is altered in individuals at risk for a cannabis use disorder
Author(s):Kleinhans NM; Sweigert J; Blake M; Douglass B; Doane B; Reitz F; Larimer M;
Address:"Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Integrated Brain Imaging Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Center on Human Development and Disability, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. The Werc Shop, Bellevue, WA, USA. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA"
Journal Title:Brain Behav
Year:2020
Volume:20200830
Issue:10
Page Number:e01764 -
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1764
ISSN/ISBN:2162-3279 (Electronic)
Abstract:"INTRODUCTION: The smell of cannabis is a cue with universal relevance to cannabis users. However, most cue reactivity imaging studies have solely utilized visual images, auditory imagery scripts, or tactile cues in their experiments. This study introduces a multimodal cue reactivity paradigm that includes picture, odor, and bimodal picture + odor cues. METHODS: Twenty-eight adults at risk for cannabis use disorder (CUD; defined as at least weekly use and Substance Involvement Score of >/=4 on the Cannabis sub-test of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test) and 26 cannabis-naive controls were exposed to cannabis and floral cues during event-related fMRI. Between-group differences in fMRI activation and correlations were tested using FMRIB's Local Analyses of Mixed Effects and corrected for multiple comparisons using a voxelwise threshold of z > 2.3 and a corrected cluster threshold of p < .05. RESULTS: Both visual and olfactory modalities resulted in significant activation of craving and reward systems, with cannabis odor cues eliciting a significantly greater response in regions mediating anticipation and reward (nucleus accumbens, pallidum, putamen, and anterior insular cortex, supplementary motor area, angular gyrus and superior frontal gyrus) and cannabis picture cues eliciting a significantly greater response in the occipital cortex and amygdala. Furthermore, the CUD group showed significantly increased activation in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), the insula, and the pallidum compared to controls. Within the CUD group, activation in the insula, anterior cingulate, and occipital cortex to bimodal cannabis cues was significantly correlated with self-reported craving. CONCLUSION: Our multimodal cue reactivity paradigm is sensitive to neural adaptations associated with problematic cannabis use"
Keywords:Adult Brain/diagnostic imaging *Cannabis Cues Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging *Marijuana Abuse Odorants addiction cannabis cues craving cue reactivity marijuana neuroimaging reward;
Notes:"MedlineKleinhans, Natalia M Sweigert, Julia Blake, Matthew Douglass, Bradley Doane, Braden Reitz, Fredrick Larimer, Mary eng P50 HD103524/HD/NICHD NIH HHS/ The Washington State Dedicated Marijuana Fund/ Jason Kilmer/ Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2020/08/31 Brain Behav. 2020 Oct; 10(10):e01764. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1764. Epub 2020 Aug 30"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024