Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractInfluence of gaseous VOC concentration on the diversity and biodegradation performance of microbial communities    Next AbstractBiocatalytic coatings for air pollution control: a proof of concept study on VOC biodegradation »

J Hazard Mater


Title:A comparative study of fungal and bacterial biofiltration treating a VOC mixture
Author(s):Estrada JM; Hernandez S; Munoz R; Revah S;
Address:"Departamento de Procesos y Tecnologia, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa, Artificios 40, Col. Miguel Hidalgo, Delegacion Alvaro Obregon, Mexico"
Journal Title:J Hazard Mater
Year:2013
Volume:20130208
Issue:
Page Number:190 - 197
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.01.064
ISSN/ISBN:1873-3336 (Electronic) 0304-3894 (Linking)
Abstract:"Bacterial biofilters usually exhibit a high microbial diversity and robustness, while fungal biofilters have been claimed to better withstand low moisture contents and pH values, and to be more efficient coping with hydrophobic volatile organic compounds (VOCs). However, there are only few systematic evaluations of both biofiltration technologies. The present study compared fungal and bacterial biofiltration for the treatment of a VOC mixture (propanal, methyl isobutyl ketone-MIBK, toluene and hexanol) under the same operating conditions. Overall, fungal biofiltration supported lower elimination capacities than its bacterial counterpart (27.7 +/- 8.9 vs 40.2 +/- 5.4 gCm(-3) reactor h(-1)), which exhibited a final pressure drop 60% higher than that of the bacterial biofilter due to mycelial growth. The VOC mineralization ratio was also higher in the bacterial bed ( approximately 63% vs approximately 43%). However, the substrate biodegradation preference order was similar for both biofilters (propanal>hexanol>MIBK>toluene) with propanal partially inhibiting the consumption of the rest of the VOCs. Both systems supported an excellent robustness versus 24h VOC starvation episodes. The implementation of a fungal/bacterial coupled system did not significantly improve the VOC removal performance compared to the individual biofilter performances"
Keywords:"Air Pollutants/isolation & purification Air Pollution Aldehydes/isolation & purification Bacteria/*metabolism *Biodegradation, Environmental Biomass Filtration Fungi/*metabolism Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Gases Hexanols/isolation & purification;"
Notes:"MedlineEstrada, Jose M Hernandez, Sergio Munoz, Raul Revah, Sergio eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Netherlands 2013/03/05 J Hazard Mater. 2013 Apr 15; 250-251:190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.01.064. Epub 2013 Feb 8"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024