Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractRegulation of bacteriocin production in Streptococcus mutans by the quorum-sensing system required for development of genetic competence    Next AbstractUncertainty assessment of VOC emissions from paint in The Netherlands using the NUSAP system »

Clin Exp Allergy


Title:Predicting steroid responsiveness in patients with asthma using exhaled breath profiling
Author(s):van der Schee MP; Palmay R; Cowan JO; Taylor DR;
Address:"Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands"
Journal Title:Clin Exp Allergy
Year:2013
Volume:43
Issue:11
Page Number:1217 - 1225
DOI: 10.1111/cea.12147
ISSN/ISBN:1365-2222 (Electronic) 0954-7894 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Exhaled breath contains disease-dependent volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which may serve as biomarkers distinguishing clinical phenotypes in asthma. Their measurement may be particularly beneficial in relation to treatment response. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the performance of electronic nose (eNose) breath analysis with previously investigated techniques (sputum eosinophils, exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and airway hyperresponsiveness) to discriminate asthma from controls and identify steroid responsiveness in steroid-free patients. Trial registration ACTRN12613000038796. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with mild/moderate asthma had their inhaled steroid treatment discontinued until loss of control or 28 days. They were subsequently treated with oral prednisone 30 mg/day for 14 days. Steroid responsiveness was defined as an increase of either > 12% FEV1 or > 2 doubling doses PC20 AMP. Steroid-free assessment of sputum eosinophils, FeNO and exhaled breath VOCs were used to construct algorithms predicting steroid responsiveness. Performance characteristics were compared by ROC analysis. RESULTS: The eNose discriminated between asthma and controls (area under the curve = 0.766 +/- 0.14; P = 0.002) with similar accuracy to FeNO (0.862 +/- 0.12; P < 0.001) and sputum eosinophils (0.814 +/- 0.15; P < 0.001). Steroid responsiveness was predicted with greater accuracy by VOC-analysis (AUC = 0.883 +/- 0.16; P = 0.008) than FeNO (0.545 +/- 0.28; P = 0.751) or sputum eosinophils (0.610 +/- 0.29; P = 0.441). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Breath analysis by eNose can identify asthmatic patients and may be used to predict their response to steroids with greater accuracy than sputum eosinophils or FeNO. This implies a potential role for breath analysis in the tailoring of treatment for asthma patients"
Keywords:"Administration, Oral Adolescent Adult Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use Asthma/*diagnosis/*drug therapy/physiopathology Biomarkers Case-Control Studies Exhalation Female Humans Male Middle Aged Prognosis ROC Curve Respiratory;"
Notes:"Medlinevan der Schee, M P Palmay, R Cowan, J O Taylor, D R eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2013/10/25 Clin Exp Allergy. 2013 Nov; 43(11):1217-25. doi: 10.1111/cea.12147"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024