Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Pheromone attraction and cross-attraction of Nezara, Acrosternum, and Euschistus spp. stink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in the field"    Next AbstractSeasonal density and natural mortality of Halyomorpha halys (Stal) and indigenous stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in a field crop agroecosystem »

J Econ Entomol


Title:Trap Cropping Systems and a Physical Barrier for Suppression of Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Cotton
Author(s):Tillman PG; Khrimian A; Cottrell TE; Lou X; Mizell RF; Johnson CJ;
Address:"USDA, ARS, Crop Protection and Management Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31793. Glynn.Tillman@ars.usda.gov. USDA, ARS, Invasive Insect Biocontrol and Behavior Laboratory, Bldg. 007 Barc-West 10300, Beltsville, MD 20705. USDA, ARS, Southeastern Fruit & Tree Nut Research Laboratory, 21 Dunbar Rd., Byron, GA 31008. University of Georgia, College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31793. NFREC-Quincy, University of Florida, 155 Research Rd., Quincy, FL 32351. USDA, ARS, Crop Protection and Management Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31793"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2015
Volume:20150727
Issue:5
Page Number:2324 - 2334
DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov217
ISSN/ISBN:0022-0493 (Print) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"Euschistus servus (Say), Nezara viridula (L.), and Chinavia hilaris (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) are economic pests of cotton in the coastal plain of the southeastern United States. The objective of this 2-yr study was to determine the ability of trap cropping systems, pheromone-baited stink bug traps, and a synthetic physical barrier at the peanut-to-cotton interface to manage stink bugs in cotton. The physical barrier was the most effective management tactic. Stink bug density in cotton was lowest for this treatment. In 2010, boll injury was lower for the physical barrier compared to the other treatments except for soybean with stink bug traps. In 2011, boll injury was lower for this treatment compared to the control. Soybean was an effective trap crop, reducing both stink bug density in cotton and boll injury regardless if used alone or in combination with either stink bug traps or buckwheat. Incorporation of buckwheat in soybean enhanced parasitism of E. servus egg masses by Telenomus podisi Ashmead in cotton. The insertion of eyelets in the lid of the insect-collecting device of a stink bug trap allowed adult stink bug parasitoids, but not E. servus, to escape. Stand-alone stink bug traps were not very effective in deterring colonization of cotton by stink bugs or reducing boll injury. The paucity of effective alternative control measures available for stink bug management justifies further full-scale evaluations into these management tactics for control of these pests in crops"
Keywords:"Animals Arachis/growth & development Crops, Agricultural/*growth & development Fagopyrum/growth & development Female Georgia Gossypium/growth & development Heteroptera/growth & development/parasitology/*physiology Host-Parasite Interactions Insect Control;"
Notes:"MedlineTillman, P G Khrimian, A Cottrell, T E Lou, X Mizell, R F 3rd Johnson, C J eng England 2015/10/11 J Econ Entomol. 2015 Oct; 108(5):2324-34. doi: 10.1093/jee/tov217. Epub 2015 Jul 27"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024