Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractVolatiles from apple trees infested with light brown apple moth larvae attract the parasitoid Dolichogenidia tasmanica    Next Abstract"Regulatory Innovation, Mating Disruption and 4-Play(TM) in New Zealand" »

Pest Manag Sci


Title:Spatial analysis of mass trapping: how close is close enough?
Author(s):Suckling DM; Stringer LD; Kean JM; Lo PL; Bell V; Walker JT; Twidle AM; Jimenez-Perez A; El-Sayed AM;
Address:"The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Christchurch, New Zealand. School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand. Better Border Biosecurity, New Zealand. Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Bruce, ACT, Australia. AgResearch Limited, Hamilton, New Zealand. The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Hastings, New Zealand. Centro de Desarrollo de Productos Bioticos, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, 62731, Yautepec, Morelos, Mexico"
Journal Title:Pest Manag Sci
Year:2015
Volume:20141230
Issue:10
Page Number:1452 - 1461
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3950
ISSN/ISBN:1526-4998 (Electronic) 1526-498X (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: The identification of new attractants can present opportunities for developing mass trapping, but standard screening methods are needed to expedite this. We have developed a simple approach based on quantifying trap interference in 4 x 4 trap arrays with different spacings. We discuss results from sex pheromones in Lepidoptera (light brown apple moth, Epiphyas postvittana), Diptera (apple leaf curling midge, Dasineura mali) and Homoptera (citrophilous mealybug, Pseudococcus calceolariae), compared with a kairomone for New Zealand flower thrips (Thrips obscuratus). RESULTS: The ratio of catch in corner traps to catch in centre traps was 25:1 at 750 D. mali traps ha(-1) , and was still approximately 5:1 at 16 traps ha(-1) , suggesting trap interference even at such low trap densities. Trap competition for sex pheromone lures at close spacing (<5 m) was evident in 16-trap arrays of P. calceolariae, but less so for E. postvittana. No trap competition was observed at 4 m spacings with the kairomone for T. obscuratus. CONCLUSIONS: The ratio of catch in traps in the corner and centre of a 16-trap array at different spacings offers a rapid preliminary assessment method for determining the potential for mass trapping. Additional knowledge of vital rates and dispersal is needed for predicting population suppression. Our approach should have value in mass trapping development. (c) 2014 Society of Chemical Industry"
Keywords:Animals Diptera/physiology Female Hemiptera/physiology Insect Control/instrumentation/*methods Male Moths/physiology Thysanoptera/physiology Dasineura mali Epiphyas postvittana Pseudococcus calceolariae Thrips obscuratus arthropod mass trapping pheromone;
Notes:"MedlineSuckling, David M Stringer, Lloyd D Kean, John M Lo, Peter L Bell, Vaughn Walker, James Ts Twidle, Andrew M Jimenez-Perez, Alfredo El-Sayed, Ashraf M eng Evaluation Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2014/12/04 Pest Manag Sci. 2015 Oct; 71(10):1452-61. doi: 10.1002/ps.3950. Epub 2014 Dec 30"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024