Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractOrganosulfates in humic-like substance fraction isolated from aerosols at seven locations in East Asia: a study by ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry    Next AbstractSilencing the alarm: an insect salivary enzyme closes plant stomata and inhibits volatile release »

Planta


Title:Oral cues are not enough: induction of defensive proteins in Nicotiana tabacum upon feeding by caterpillars
Author(s):Lin PA; Felton GW;
Address:"Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA. pbl5066@psu.edu. Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA"
Journal Title:Planta
Year:2020
Volume:20200330
Issue:4
Page Number:89 -
DOI: 10.1007/s00425-020-03385-3
ISSN/ISBN:1432-2048 (Electronic) 0032-0935 (Linking)
Abstract:"The study challenges the general belief that plants are highly sensitive to oral cues of herbivores and reveals the role of the damage level on the magnitude of defense induction. Many leaf-feeding caterpillars share similar feeding behaviors involving repeated removal of previously wounded leaf tissue (semicircle feeding pattern). We hypothesized that this behavior is a strategy to attenuate plant-induced defenses by removing both the oral cues and tissues that detect it. Using tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and the tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta), we found that tobacco increased defensive responses during herbivory compared to mechanical wounding at moderate damage levels (30%). However, tobacco did not differentiate between mechanical wounding and herbivory when the level of leaf tissue loss was either small (4%) or severe (100%, whole leaf removal). Higher amounts of oral cues did not induce higher defenses when damage was small. Severe damage led to the highest level of systemic defense proteins compared to other levels of leaf tissue loss with or without oral cues. In conclusion, we did not find clear evidence that semicircle feeding behavior compromises plant defense induction. In addition, the level of leaf tissue loss and oral cues interact to determine the level of induced defensive responses in tobacco. Although oral cues play an important role in inducing defensive proteins, the level of induction depends more on the level of leaf tissue loss in tobacco"
Keywords:Animals *Cues Feeding Behavior/*psychology Herbivory Host-Parasite Interactions Larva/*physiology Manduca/*physiology Moths/*physiology Plant Leaves/metabolism Plant Proteins/metabolism Protease Inhibitors Tobacco/*physiology Wounds and Injuries Damage le;
Notes:"MedlineLin, Po-An Felton, Gary W eng Grants-in-Aid of Research/Sigma Xi/ 2017-67013-26596/U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (US)/ PEN04576/Advanced Centre of Research in High Energy Materials, University of Hyderabad (IN)/ Germany 2020/04/02 Planta. 2020 Mar 30; 251(4):89. doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03385-3"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-06-2024