Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractSeed treatment using methyl jasmonate induces resistance to rice water weevil but reduces plant growth in rice    Next AbstractVolatile Organic Compound Fragmentation in the Afterglow of Pulsed Glow Discharge in Ambient Air »

J Breath Res


Title:Recognition of breathprints of lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using the Aeonose((R)) electronic nose
Author(s):Krauss E; Haberer J; Barreto G; Degen M; Seeger W; Guenther A;
Address:"Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Klinikstr. 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany. European IPF Registry & Biobank (eurIPFreg), 35392 Giessen, Germany"
Journal Title:J Breath Res
Year:2020
Volume:20200724
Issue:4
Page Number:46004 -
DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/ab8c50
ISSN/ISBN:1752-7163 (Electronic) 1752-7155 (Linking)
Abstract:"OBJECTIVES: There is a high unmet need in a non-invasive screening of lung cancer (LC). We conducted this single-center trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the electronic nose Aeonose ((R)) in LC recognition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Exhaled volatile organic compound (VOC) signatures were collected by Aeonose ((R)) in 42 incident and 78 prevalent LC patients, of them 29 LC patients in complete remission (LC CR), 33 healthy controls (HC) and 23 COPD patients. By dichotomous comparison of VOC's between incident LC and HC, a discriminating algorithm was established and also applied to LC CR and COPD subjects. Area under Curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and Matthews's correlation coefficient (MC) were used to interpret the data. RESULTS: The established algorithm of Aeonose ((R)) signature allowed safe separation of LC and HC, showing an AUC of 0.92, sensitivity of 0.84 and a specificity of 0.97. When tested in a blinded fashion, the device recognized 19 out of 29 LC CR patients (=65.5%) as LC-positive, of which only five developed recurrent LC later on (after 18.6 months [Formula: see text]; mean value [Formula: see text]). Unfortunately, the algorithm also recognized 11 of 24 COPD patients as being LC positive (with only one of the 24 COPD patients developing LC 56 months after the measurement). CONCLUSION: The Aeonose ((R)) revealed some potential in distinguishing LC from HC, however, with low specificity when applying the algorithm in a blinded fashion to other disease cohorts. We conclude that relevant VOC signals originating from comorbidities in LC such as COPD may have erroneously led to the separation between LC and controls. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: (NCT02951416)"
Keywords:"Adult Breath Tests/*instrumentation Case-Control Studies Electronic Nose/*standards Female Humans Lung Neoplasms/*diagnosis Male Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/*diagnosis Young Adult;"
Notes:"MedlineKrauss, Ekaterina Haberer, Jana Barreto, Guillermo Degen, Maria Seeger, Werner Guenther, Andreas eng England 2020/04/24 J Breath Res. 2020 Jul 24; 14(4):046004. doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/ab8c50"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024