Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractParasitoids select plants more heavily infested with their caterpillar hosts: a new approach to aid interpretation of plant headspace volatiles    Next AbstractVolatile organic compounds and building bake-out »

J Chem Ecol


Title:The plume also rises: trajectories of pheromone plumes issuing from point sources in an orchard canopy at night
Author(s):Girling RD; Higbee BS; Carde RT;
Address:
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2013
Volume:39
Issue:9
Page Number:1150 - 1160
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-013-0341-9
ISSN/ISBN:1573-1561 (Electronic) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"The trajectories of pheromone plumes in canopied habitats, such as orchards, have been little studied. We documented the capture of male navel orangeworm moths, Amyelois transitella, in female-baited traps positioned at 5 levels, from ground level to the canopy top, at approximately 6 m above ground, in almond orchards. Males were captured in similar proportions at all levels, suggesting that they do not favor a particular height during ranging flight. A 3-D sonic anemometer was used to establish patterns of wind flow and temperature at 6 heights from 2.08 to 6.65 m in an almond orchard with a 5 m high canopy, every 3 h over 72 h. The horizontal velocity of wind flow was highest above the canopy, where its directionality also was the most consistent. During the time of A. transitella mating (0300-0600), there was a net vertical displacement upward. Vertical buoyancy combined with only minor reductions in the distance that plumes will travel in the lower compared to the upper canopy suggest that the optimal height for release of pheromone from high-release rate sources, such as aerosol dispensers ('puffers'), that are deployed at low densities (e.g., 3 per ha.) would be at mid or low in the canopy, thereby facilitating dispersion of disruptant throughout the canopy. Optimal placement of aerosol dispensers will vary with the behavioral ecology of the target pest; however, our results suggest that current protocols, which generally propose dispenser placement in the upper third of the canopy, should be reevaluated"
Keywords:"Animals Ecosystem Female Insect Control/methods Male Moths/*physiology Prunus Sex Attractants/*physiology Sexual Behavior, Animal/*physiology Temperature Wind;"
Notes:"MedlineGirling, Robbie D Higbee, Bradley S Carde, Ring T eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2013/10/01 J Chem Ecol. 2013 Sep; 39(9):1150-60. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0341-9"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024