Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractComparison between the conventional anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge and its combination with a chemical or thermal pre-treatment concerning the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products    Next AbstractExperimental and modeling investigation of metal release from metal-spiked sediments »

Neurosci Lett


Title:"First gender, then attractiveness: Indications of gender-specific attractiveness processing via ERP onsets"
Author(s):Carbon CC; Faerber SJ; Augustin MD; Mitterer B; Hutzler F;
Address:"Department of General Psychology and Methodology, University of Bamberg, Bavaria, Germany; Research Group EPAEG (Ergonomics, Psychological AEsthetics, Gestalt), Bamberg, Bavaria, Germany. Electronic address: ccc@experimental-psychology.com. Department of General Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Jena, Germany. Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Belgium. Department of Basic Psychological Research, University of Vienna, Austria. Centre for Neurocognitive Research & Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Austria"
Journal Title:Neurosci Lett
Year:2018
Volume:20180912
Issue:
Page Number:186 - 192
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.09.009
ISSN/ISBN:1872-7972 (Electronic) 0304-3940 (Linking)
Abstract:"We followed an ERP-based approach to gain knowledge on the dependence and temporal order of two essential processes of face perception: attractiveness and gender. By combining a dual-choice task with a go/nogo-paradigm focusing on the LRP and N200-effect, we could estimate the processing times and onsets of both types of face processing. The analyses of the LRP revealed that gender aspects were processed much earlier than attractiveness. Whereas gender was already analysed 243.9 ms post-stimulus onset, attractiveness came into play 58.6 ms later, i.e. after a post-stimulus onset delay of 302.5 ms. This resulting pattern was mirrored by the analyses of the N200-effect, an effect available mainly frontally which is supposed to correlate with the inhibition of inappropriate responses. Taking the onset of the N200 effect as an estimator for the moment at which information has been processed sufficiently for task decision, we could trace the N200 effect at 152.0 ms for go/nogo-decision on gender, while not as early as 206.7 ms on attractiveness. In sum, processing of facial attractiveness seems to be based on gender-specific aesthetic pre-processing, for instance via activating gender-specific attractiveness prototypes which show focused processing of certain facial aspects"
Keywords:"Adult Brain Mapping/methods Electroencephalography/methods *Event-Related Potentials, P300 Facial Expression Female Functional Laterality/*physiology Humans Male Photic Stimulation/methods Reaction Time/physiology *Sex Attractants *Sex Factors Visual Perc;neuroscience;"
Notes:"MedlineCarbon, Claus-Christian Faerber, Stella J Augustin, M Dorothee Mitterer, Bernhard Hutzler, Florian eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Ireland 2018/09/16 Neurosci Lett. 2018 Nov 1; 686:186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 12"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 04-12-2024