Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractAntennal transcriptome analysis and expression profiles of olfactory genes in Anoplophora chinensis    Next AbstractHelicoverpa zea gut-associated bacteria indirectly induce defenses in tomato by triggering a salivary elicitor(s) »

Environ Pollut


Title:Distribution mode and environmental risk of POP pesticides such as endosulfan under the agricultural practice of straw incorporating
Author(s):Wang J; Li L; Liu J; Ti B;
Address:"State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China. Electronic address: jgliu@pku.edu.cn"
Journal Title:Environ Pollut
Year:2017
Volume:20161105
Issue:Pt B
Page Number:1394 - 1399
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.095
ISSN/ISBN:1873-6424 (Electronic) 0269-7491 (Linking)
Abstract:"The practice of incorporating post-harvest crop waste is widely used because it maintains soil fertility and avoids environmental pollution from straw burning. However, the practice of straw incorporation may also retain the pesticides that are applied to crop plants, which may pose a potential long term risk to local and regional environments if the applied pesticide is a Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT) substance or a Persistent Organic Pollutant (POP). Here we investigate the influence of the 'receiving-retention-release' route on the distribution of a POP pesticide (endosulfan) and the associated environmental risk among different environmental compartments. Our study indicates that most endosulfan enters the atmosphere (phi(atmosphere) = 64.5-72.5%), which is dominated by the indirect route of volatilization from crop plants (phi(atmosphere, indirect) = 54.7-70.3%). In contrast, soil releases are minor (phi(soil) = 10.8-20.5%), and are dominated by direct release during application (phi(soil, direct) = 8.0-18.0%). Under the practice of straw incorporation, the use of endosulfan posed an environmental risk to agricultural soil. In addition, the atmospheric deposition of endosulfan also posed an environmental risk to sediment. The study highlights the significance of the 'receiving-retention-release' route by crop plants in determining the fate of POP pesticides associated with straw incorporation; hence complementing the current methodology for assessing the environmental risk of these compounds"
Keywords:Agriculture/methods Atmosphere/chemistry Endosulfan/*analysis/chemistry Environmental Monitoring/methods Environmental Pollution Pesticides/*analysis/chemistry Risk Assessment Soil/*chemistry Soil Pollutants/*analysis/chemistry Endosulfan Environmental ri;
Notes:"MedlineWang, Jie Li, Li Liu, Jianguo Ti, Bowen eng England 2016/11/09 Environ Pollut. 2017 Jan; 220(Pt B):1394-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.095. Epub 2016 Nov 5"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-06-2024