Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractLinks Between Feeding Preferences and Electroantennogram Response Profiles in Dung Beetles: The Importance of Dung Odor Bouquets    Next AbstractEvaluation of HKUST-1 as Volatile Organic Compound Adsorbents for Respiratory Filters »

J Air Waste Manag Assoc


Title:Indoor monoterpene emission rates from commercial cannabis cultivation facilities in Colorado
Author(s):Urso K; Vizuete W; Moravec R; Khlystov A; Frazier A; Morrison G;
Address:"Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO, USA. Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, USA"
Journal Title:J Air Waste Manag Assoc
Year:2023
Volume:73
Issue:4
Page Number:321 - 332
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2023.2175741
ISSN/ISBN:2162-2906 (Electronic) 1096-2247 (Linking)
Abstract:"In 2019, an air emissions field sampling study was conducted by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's Air Pollution Control Division (APCD) at four commercial cannabis cultivation facilities. Measurements of ambient biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOC) concentrations were collected from various growing stages of cannabis (vegetative and flowering) and during post-harvest activities (drying and trimming). These data were then used to determine room-specific biogenic VOC emission rates for three of the facilities from the vegetative stage of the life cycle through post-harvest activities. This study shows that the magnitude of biogenic VOC emissions within a cannabis cultivation facility varies widely with the highest emission rates of up to 7.18E-1 kg/hr found during mechanical trimming and up to 2.33E-1 kg/hr in the drying rooms. These were up to an order of magnitude higher than emission rates found in the cultivation rooms. For example, Facility A vegetative room had an emissions rate of 1.46E-2 kg/hr. Normalized by the amount of biomass present, the drying rooms had the highest VOC emissions rates, with a maximum rate of 1.6E-3 kg/hr/kg biomass. The flowering room rates were found to be up to 3.25E-4 kg/hr/kg biomass and drying rooms up to 1.16E-3 kg/hr/kg biomass. When normalized by plant count, emission rates in the flower rooms ranged from 8.11E-6 to 3.62E-4 kg/hr/plant. The dominant monoterpenes from sampling were beta-myrcene, terpinolene, and D-limonene. These data suggest that the variability in emission rates across cannabis production will create a challenge in establishing a generalized emission factor for all facilities. Across the industry, cannabis cultivation conditions and strategies can vary widely impacting the amount and type of VOC emissions. Minimizing uncertainties for VOC emission from cannabis facilities requires site-specific information on air exchange rates, plant counts, cannabis strains, biomass, and if hand or mechanical processing is used.Implications: This study found that the magnitude of biogenic VOC emissions within a cannabis cultivation varies widely throughout rooms found in the facility, with the highest emissions found during post-harvest activities (i.e. trimming) and the lowest rates in the vegetative room. These data suggest that the large emission sources of VOCs are found post-harvest and emission inventories based solely on cultivation emissions will underestimate total biogenic VOC emissions from indoor cannabis cultivation facilities. The dominant measured terpenes throughout all facilities from cultivation to post harvest were: beta-myrcene, terpinolene, and D-limonene"
Keywords:Monoterpenes *Cannabis *Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis Colorado Limonene Environmental Monitoring *Air Pollutants/analysis;
Notes:"MedlineUrso, Kaitlin Vizuete, William Moravec, Ryan Khlystov, Andrey Frazier, Alicia Morrison, Glenn eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 2023/02/03 J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2023 Apr; 73(4):321-332. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2023.2175741"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 03-07-2024