Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractInvestigation of the Photocatalytic Oxidation of Low-Level Carbonyl Compounds    Next AbstractConstitutive mutants of the protein kinase STE11 activate the yeast pheromone response pathway in the absence of the G protein »

Oecologia


Title:Induced resistance in the indeterminate growth of aspen (Populus tremuloides)
Author(s):Stevens MT; Lindroth RL;
Address:"Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA. mtsteven@wisc.edu"
Journal Title:Oecologia
Year:2005
Volume:20051025
Issue:2
Page Number:298 - 306
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0128-y
ISSN/ISBN:0029-8549 (Print) 0029-8549 (Linking)
Abstract:"Studies of induction in trees have examined rapid induced resistance (RIR) or delayed induced resistance (DIR), but have not examined induction that occurs in leaves produced by indeterminately growing trees subsequent to, but in the same season as, damage. We refer to induction that occurs during this time period as intermediate-delayed induced resistance (IDIR). We assessed the influences of genetic and environmental factors, and their interactions, on temporal and spatial variation in induction and on tradeoffs between induced and constitutive levels of resistance in indeterminately growing saplings of aspen (Populus tremuloides). We utilized a common garden of 12 aspen genotypes experiencing two levels of defoliation and two levels of soil nutrients. We assessed concentrations of phenolic glycosides and condensed tannins in damaged leaf remnants collected 1 week after defoliation to examine rapid and local induction, and in undamaged leaves produced 8 weeks after defoliation to assess intermediate-delayed and systemic induction. In general, tannins showed RIR, while phenolic glycosides expressed IDIR. For both classes of allelochemicals, we found high estimates of broad-sense heritability and genetic variation in both induced and constitutive levels. Genetic variation may be maintained by both direct costs of allelochemicals and by costs of inducibility (phenotypic plasticity). Such costs may drive the tradeoff exhibited between induced and constitutive levels of phenolic glycosides. IDIR may be important in reducing total-season tissue loss by providing augmented resistance against late summer herbivores in trees that have experienced damage earlier in the season. Herbivore-resistant compensatory growth is especially beneficial to young trees growing in competitive environments"
Keywords:Animals Genotype Glycosides/metabolism Plant Leaves/genetics/parasitology/*physiology Populus/genetics/*growth & development/*parasitology Proanthocyanidins/metabolism Time Factors;
Notes:"MedlineStevens, Michael T Lindroth, Richard L eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Germany 2005/06/17 Oecologia. 2005 Sep; 145(2):298-306. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0128-y. Epub 2005 Oct 25"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024