Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEffect of roasting conditions on color and volatile profile including HMF level in sweet almonds (Prunus dulcis)    Next AbstractBiocontrol ability and action mechanisms of Aureobasidium pullulans GE17 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii KL3 against Penicillium digitatum DSM2750 and Penicillium expansum DSM62841 causing postharvest diseases »

J Food Sci


Title:Effect of adulteration versus storage on volatiles in unifloral honeys from different floral sources and locations
Author(s):Agila A; Barringer S;
Address:"Dept. of Food Science & Technology, Ohio State Univ., 2015 Fyffe Rd, Columbus, OH 43210, USA"
Journal Title:J Food Sci
Year:2013
Volume:20130117
Issue:2
Page Number:C184 - C191
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.12033
ISSN/ISBN:1750-3841 (Electronic) 0022-1147 (Linking)
Abstract:"High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) was added at 5% to 40% to Indiana wildflower honey and added at 40% to Ohio and Indiana honeys from blueberry, star thistle, clover and wildflower, and an unknown source to simulate honey adulteration. Unadulterated honeys were also stored at 37 masculineC from 1 to 6 mo. The volatile composition was measured by Selected Ion Flow Tube Mass Spectrometry (SIFT-MS). Most volatiles decreased in concentration with both increasing HFCS and storage time. Furfural significantly increased in concentration in all adulterated honeys and 1,3-butanediol, acetonitrile, and heptane in some adulterated honeys. During storage, the volatiles that increased were maltol, furfural, 5-methylfurfural, and 5-hydroxymethyl furfural in all honeys and also acetic acid and 1-octen-3-ol levels in some honeys. Soft independent modeling by class analogy (SIMCA) was used to differentiate the volatile profiles of adulterated honeys from fresh and stored honeys. The volatile profiles of honeys in accelerated storage for up to 4 mo and the honeys adulterated with 40% HFCS were significantly different. Acetic acid had the most discriminating power in Ohio star thistle and blueberry honeys and unknown honey while furfural had the greatest discriminating power in Indiana blueberry, star thistle, and clover honeys. Adulteration and storage of honey both reduced the volatile levels, but since they changed the volatile composition of the fresh honey differently, SIMCA was able to differentiate adulteration from storage. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Analysis of adulterated and stored honeys determined that both decrease volatile levels, and no clear indicator volatiles were found. However, SIMCA can be used to distinguish the volatile profiles of fresh or stored honeys, from adulterated honeys"
Keywords:Acetic Acid/analysis Butylene Glycols/analysis Food Contamination/*analysis Food Storage/*methods Fructose/analysis/chemistry Furaldehyde/analogs & derivatives/analysis Honey/*analysis Indiana Mass Spectrometry Multivariate Analysis Octanols/analysis Ohio;
Notes:"MedlineAgila, Amal Barringer, Sheryl eng 2013/01/22 J Food Sci. 2013 Feb; 78(2):C184-91. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12033. Epub 2013 Jan 17"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-06-2024