Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractIsomeric Identification of Particle-Phase Organic Nitrates through Gas Chromatography and Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Coupled with an Electron Capture Negative Ionization Source    Next AbstractAphid endosymbiont facilitates virus transmission by modulating the volatile profile of host plants »

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao


Title:"[Effects of canopy shapes of grape on canopy microenvironment, leaf and fruit quality in greenhouse]"
Author(s):Shi XB; Liu FZ; Cheng CG; Wang XD; Wang BL; Zheng XC; Wang HB;
Address:
Journal Title:Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao
Year:2015
Volume:26
Issue:12
Page Number:3730 - 3736
DOI:
ISSN/ISBN:1001-9332 (Print) 1001-9332 (Linking)
Abstract:"The effects of three canopy shapes, i.e., vertical canopy, V-shaped canopy and horizontal canopy, on canopy microenvironment, quality of leaves and fruits were studied in the 3-year-old grape 'Jingmi' grafted on ' Beta' in greenhouse. The results showed that gap fraction and openness of vertical canopy were significantly higher than that of V-shaped canopy and horizontal canopy, and leaf area index, light interception rate and canopy temperature difference between day and night were significantly lower than those of V-shaped canopy and horizontal canopy. There was no significant difference between the latter two treatments. The palisade thickness of V-shaped canopy was significantly greater than that of vertical canopy, and horizontal canopy was in the middle. The chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of V-shaped canopy were significantly higher than those of vertical canopy and horizontal canopy, and those in the latter two treatments had no significant difference. The fruit quality of V-shaped canopy was the best, and that of horizontal canopy was the worst. The results of GC-MS analysis showed that 29 types of volatile aroma compounds were detected in V-shaped canopy, but just 17 and 16 in vertical canopy and horizontal canopy, respectively. In V-shaped canopy, the characteristic aroma in grape 'Jingmi' was higher, except ethanol, trans-2- hexene-1-alcohol, 2-octyl ketone and formic acid ester. The linalool content in vertical canopy and V-shaped canopy was higher than that in horizontal canopy. The nerol content in V-shaped canopy was higher than that in vertical canopy and horizontal canopy, and the leaf alcohol content in V-shaped canopy and horizontal canopy was higher than that in vertical canopy. The citronellol was de-tected only in V-shaped canopy. In greenhouse, the fruit aroma of V-shaped canopy grape was stronger, and well reflected the variety characteristics"
Keywords:Agriculture/*methods Carotenoids/chemistry Chlorophyll/chemistry Fruit/*chemistry Light Odorants Photosynthesis Plant Leaves/chemistry/*physiology Vitis/*physiology Volatile Organic Compounds/chemistry;
Notes:"MedlineShi, Xiang-bin Liu, Feng-zhi Cheng, Cun-gang Wang, Xiao-di Wang, Bao-liang Zheng, Xiao-cui Wang, Hai-bo chi China 2016/04/27 Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2015 Dec; 26(12):3730-6"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024