Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDistinct neuropeptide-receptor modules regulate a sex-specific behavioral response to a pheromone    Next AbstractAlcoholism in cockchafers: orientation of male Melolontha melolontha towards green leaf alcohols »

PLoS Comput Biol


Title:Negative feedback may suppress variation to improve collective foraging performance
Author(s):Reina A; Marshall JAR;
Address:"Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom. IRIDIA, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium. Opteran Technologies Limited, Sheffield, United Kingdom"
Journal Title:PLoS Comput Biol
Year:2022
Volume:20220518
Issue:5
Page Number:e1010090 -
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010090
ISSN/ISBN:1553-7358 (Electronic) 1553-734X (Print) 1553-734X (Linking)
Abstract:"Social insect colonies use negative as well as positive feedback signals to regulate foraging behaviour. In ants and bees individual foragers have been observed to use negative pheromones or mechano-auditory signals to indicate that forage sources are not ideal, for example being unrewarded, crowded, or dangerous. Here we propose an additional function for negative feedback signals during foraging, variance reduction. We show that while on average populations will converge to desired distributions over forage patches both with and without negative feedback signals, in small populations negative feedback reduces variation around the target distribution compared to the use of positive feedback alone. Our results are independent of the nature of the target distribution, providing it can be achieved by foragers collecting only local information. Since robustness is a key aim for biological systems, and deviation from target foraging distributions may be costly, we argue that this could be a further important and hitherto overlooked reason that negative feedback signals are used by foraging social insects"
Keywords:Animals *Ants/physiology Bees Crowding Feedback *Feeding Behavior/physiology Pheromones/physiology;
Notes:"MedlineReina, Andreagiovanni Marshall, James A R eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2022/05/19 PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 May 18; 18(5):e1010090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010090. eCollection 2022 May"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024