Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEnterococcus faecalis sex pheromone plasmid pAM373: analyses of TraA and evidence for its interaction with RpoB    Next Abstract"Effect of enzymes on strawberry volatiles during storage, at different ripeness level, in different cultivars, and during eating" »

J Sci Food Agric


Title:Botanical and geographical origin of Turkish honeys by selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry and chemometrics
Author(s):Ozcan-Sinir G; Copur OU; Barringer SA;
Address:"Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Food Engineering, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey. Department of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA"
Journal Title:J Sci Food Agric
Year:2020
Volume:20200118
Issue:5
Page Number:2198 - 2207
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10244
ISSN/ISBN:1097-0010 (Electronic) 0022-5142 (Print) 0022-5142 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Honey has a very important commercial value for producers as a natural product. Honey aroma is formed from the contributions of several volatile compounds, which are influenced by nectar composition, botanical origins, and location. Selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) is a technique that quantifies volatile organic compounds simply and rapidly, even in low concentrations. In this study, the headspace concentration of eight monofloral (chestnut, rhododendron, lavender, sage, carob, heather, citrus, and pine) and three multiflower Turkish honeys were analyzed using SIFT-MS. Soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) was used to differentiate honey samples based on their volatiles. RESULTS: This study focused on 78 volatile compounds, which were selected from previous studies of selected honeys. Very clear distinctions were observed between all honeys. Interclass distances greater than 8 indicate that honeys were significantly different. Methanol and ethanol were abundant in the honeys. Chestnut honey collected from the Yalova region had the highest total concentration of volatiles followed by heather honey and chestnut honey collected from the Duzce region. CONCLUSION: Honeys with different botanical and geographical origins showed differences in their volatile profile based on chemometric analysis. Of the honey samples, methanol, ethanol, acetoin, ethyl acetate, and isobutanoic acid had the highest discriminating power. Methanol and ethanol, and then acetic acid, were the volatiles with the highest concentrations in most honeys. (c) 2020 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry"
Keywords:Acetates/analysis Acetic Acid/analysis Ethanol/analysis Flowers/chemistry Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry *Geography Honey/*analysis Mass Spectrometry Methanol/analysis Multivariate Analysis Odorants/analysis Turkey Volatile Organic Compounds/*analys;
Notes:"MedlineOzcan-Sinir, Gulsah Copur, Omer U Barringer, Sheryl A eng 2219/TUBITAK/ England 2020/01/05 J Sci Food Agric. 2020 Mar 30; 100(5):2198-2207. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10244. Epub 2020 Jan 18"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024