Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractCombination of aquifer thermal energy storage and enhanced bioremediation: resilience of reductive dechlorination to redox changes    Next AbstractEffects of turning over intensity on fatty acid metabolites in postharvest leaves of Tieguanyin oolong tea (Camellia sinensis) »

Environ Sci Technol


Title:Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment of Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage Integrated with in Situ Bioremediation of Chlorinated Volatile Organic Compounds
Author(s):Ni Z; Wang Y; Wang Y; Chen S; Xie M; Grotenhuis T; Qiu R;
Address:"School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, 135 Xingang Xi Road, 510275 Guangzhou, China. Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, 135 Xingang Xi Road, 510275 Guangzhou, China. Environmental Technology, Wageningen University, Bornse Weilanden 9, 6708 WG Wageningen, the Netherlands"
Journal Title:Environ Sci Technol
Year:2020
Volume:20200218
Issue:5
Page Number:3039 - 3049
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b07020
ISSN/ISBN:1520-5851 (Electronic) 0013-936X (Linking)
Abstract:"Due to the increasing need for sustainable energy and environmental quality in urban areas, the combination of aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) and in situ bioremediation (ISB) has drawn much attention as it can deliver an integrated contribution to fulfill both demands. Yet, little is known about the overall environmental impacts of ATES-ISB. Hence, we applied a life-cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental performance of ATES-ISB, which is also compared with the conventional heating and cooling system plus ISB alone (CHC + ISB). Energy supply via electricity is revealed as the primary cause of the environmental impacts, contributing 61.26% impacts of ATES-ISB and 72.91% impacts of CHC + ISB. Specifically, electricity is responsible for over 95% of water use, global warming potential, acidification potential, and respiratory inorganics, whereas the production of the biological medium for bioremediation causes more than 85% of the eco- and human toxicity impacts in both cases. The overall environmental impact of ATES-ISB is two times smaller than that of CHC + ISB. Sensitivity analysis confirms the importance of electricity consumption and electron donor production to the environmental impacts in both energy supply and bioremediation. Thus, future studies and practical applications seeking possible optimization of the environmental performances of ATES-ISB are recommended to focus more on these two essential elements, e.g., electricity and electron donor, and their related parameters. With the comprehensive LCA, insight is obtained for better characterizing the crucial factors as well as the relevant direction for future optimization research of the ATES-ISB system"
Keywords:"Biodegradation, Environmental Electricity *Groundwater Hot Temperature Humans *Volatile Organic Compounds;"
Notes:"MedlineNi, Zhuobiao Wang, Yue Wang, Yafei Chen, Shaoqing Xie, Manxi Grotenhuis, Tim Qiu, Rongliang eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2020/02/06 Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Mar 3; 54(5):3039-3049. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b07020. Epub 2020 Feb 18"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024