Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractElectrophysiological and Behavioral Responses of Queensland Fruit Fly Females to Fruit Odors    Next AbstractEvaluation of Antioxidant Capacity of Solanum sessiliflorum (Cubiu) Extract: An In Vitro Assay »

J Econ Entomol


Title:Odorant-Based Detection and Discrimination of Two Economic Pests in Export Apples
Author(s):Mas F; Horner R; Cazeres S; Alavi M; Suckling DM;
Address:"The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Biosecurity Group, PB, Christchurch, New Zealand. Better Border Biosecurity (B3) (http://b3nz.org). Institut Agronomique neo-Caledonien, Laboratoire d'Entomologie Appliquee, Station de Recherches Fruitieres de Pocquereux, La Foa, New Caledonia, France. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2020
Volume:113
Issue:1
Page Number:134 - 143
DOI: 10.1093/jee/toz254
ISSN/ISBN:1938-291X (Electronic) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"Detection of pest infestations in fresh produce traded internationally could offer improved prospects for reducing the movement of unwanted pests. Because immature stages of some pests can be difficult to find visually, other cues such as herbivore-induced volatiles that can potentially be detected at the early stages of infestation are worth investigating. In this study, we artificially infested postharvested apples (Malus x domestica 'Royal Gala') with two economic apple pests, the specialist codling moth (CM, Cydia pomonella Linnaeus, Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and the generalist Queensland fruit fly (QFF, Bactrocera tryoni, Froggatt, Diptera: Tephritidae) and collected volatile organic compounds (VOCs) over time (days 0, 6, and 14-15). In both infestation experiments, we found a strong and significant interaction between time and treatment. Apples infested with the QFF emitted lower total amounts of VOCs than uninfested apples, whereas apples infested with the CM released similar total amounts of VOCs. Apples infested with CM had increases in several hexyl and butyl esters, which were particularly noticeable after 15 d. In contrast, changes in ethyl esters were characteristics of QFF infestation and could be detected from day 6. Our multilevel and multivariate statistical analysis identified specific volatile biomarkers for each species at each sampling time that can be used to design a new tool for remote detection and surveillance of these invasive pests in harvested apples. Nevertheless, other information such as the cultivar as well as the storage condition needs to be taken into consideration to increase accuracy of future odorant-based sensors for pest identification"
Keywords:Animals Esters *Malus *Moths Odorants *Volatile Organic Compounds fruit biomarker herbivore-induced infestation volatile;
Notes:"MedlineMas, Flore Horner, Rachael Cazeres, Sylvie Alavi, Maryam Suckling, David Maxwell eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2019/10/08 J Econ Entomol. 2020 Feb 8; 113(1):134-143. doi: 10.1093/jee/toz254"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024