Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractThe application of leak detection and repair program in VOCs control in China's petroleum refineries    Next Abstract"Chronic larval exposure to thiacloprid impairs honeybee antennal selectivity, learning and memory performances" »

IEEE Trans Cybern


Title:MOEA/D-ACO: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm using decomposition and AntColony
Author(s):Ke L; Zhang Q; Battiti R;
Address:
Journal Title:IEEE Trans Cybern
Year:2013
Volume:43
Issue:6
Page Number:1845 - 1859
DOI: 10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2231860
ISSN/ISBN:2168-2275 (Electronic) 2168-2267 (Linking)
Abstract:"Combining ant colony optimization (ACO) and the multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (EA) based on decomposition (MOEA/D), this paper proposes a multiobjective EA, i.e., MOEA/D-ACO. Following other MOEA/D-like algorithms, MOEA/D-ACO decomposes a multiobjective optimization problem into a number of single-objective optimization problems. Each ant (i.e., agent) is responsible for solving one subproblem. All the ants are divided into a few groups, and each ant has several neighboring ants. An ant group maintains a pheromone matrix, and an individual ant has a heuristic information matrix. During the search, each ant also records the best solution found so far for its subproblem. To construct a new solution, an ant combines information from its group's pheromone matrix, its own heuristic information matrix, and its current solution. An ant checks the new solutions constructed by itself and its neighbors, and updates its current solution if it has found a better one in terms of its own objective. Extensive experiments have been conducted in this paper to study and compare MOEA/D-ACO with other algorithms on two sets of test problems. On the multiobjective 0-1 knapsack problem,MOEA/D-ACO outperforms the MOEA/D with conventional genetic operators and local search on all the nine test instances. We also demonstrate that the heuristic information matrices in MOEA/D-ACO are crucial to the good performance of MOEA/D-ACO for the knapsack problem. On the biobjective traveling salesman problem, MOEA/D-ACO performs much better than the BicriterionAnt on all the 12 test instances. We also evaluate the effects of grouping, neighborhood, and the location information of current solutions on the performance of MOEA/D-ACO. The work in this paper shows that reactive search optimization scheme, i.e., the 'learning while optimizing' principle, is effective in improving multiobjective optimization algorithms"
Keywords:"*Algorithms Animals Ants/*physiology *Artificial Intelligence Biological Evolution Biomimetics/*methods *Decision Support Techniques Pattern Recognition, Automated/*methods;"
Notes:"MedlineKe, Liangjun Zhang, Qingfu Battiti, Roberto eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2013/06/13 IEEE Trans Cybern. 2013 Dec; 43(6):1845-59. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2231860"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024