Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDependency on floral resources determines the animals' responses to floral scents    Next AbstractComposition of epiphytic bacterial communities differs on petals and leaves »

Ann Bot


Title:"Floral scents repel facultative flower visitors, but attract obligate ones"
Author(s):Junker RR; Bluthgen N;
Address:"Department of Animal Ecology & Tropical Biology, University of Wurzburg Biozentrum, Am Hubland, 97074 Wurzburg, Germany"
Journal Title:Ann Bot
Year:2010
Volume:20100312
Issue:5
Page Number:777 - 782
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq045
ISSN/ISBN:1095-8290 (Electronic) 0305-7364 (Print) 0305-7364 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Biological mutualisms rely on communication between partners, but also require protective measures against exploitation. Animal-pollinated flowers need to attract pollinators but also to avoid conflicts with antagonistic consumers. The view of flower visitors as mutualistic and antagonistic agents considers primarily the plants' interest. A classification emphasizing the consumer's point of view, however, may be more useful when considering animal's adaptations to flower visits which may include a tolerance against defensive floral scent compounds. METHODS: In a meta-analysis covering 18 studies on the responses of animals to floral scents, the animals were assigned to the categories of obligate and facultative flower visitors which considers their dependency on floral resources. Their responses on floral scents were compared. KEY RESULTS: On average, obligate flower visitors, often corresponding to pollinators, were attracted to floral scent compounds. In contrast, facultative and mainly antagonistic visitors were strongly repelled by floral scents. The findings confirm that floral scents have a dual function both as attractive and defensive cues. CONCLUSIONS: Whether an animal depends on floral resources determines its response to these signals, suggesting that obligate flower visitors evolved a tolerance against primarily defensive compounds. Therefore, floral scent bouquets in conjunction with nutritious rewards may solve the conflicting tasks of attracting mutualists while repelling antagonists"
Keywords:Flowers/*metabolism/*physiology *Odorants Pollination/*physiology Terpenes/metabolism;
Notes:"MedlineJunker, Robert R Bluthgen, Nico eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2010/03/17 Ann Bot. 2010 May; 105(5):777-82. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq045. Epub 2010 Mar 12"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 03-07-2024