Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractBehavioural and Electrophysiological Response of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) to a gamma-Lactone Synthetic Semiochemical    Next AbstractInfluence of nitrogen status in wine alcoholic fermentation »

Can J Microbiol


Title:Effect of biofumigation with volatiles from Muscodor albus on the viability of Tilletia spp. teliospores
Author(s):Goates BJ; Mercier J;
Address:"USDA-ARS, Aberdeen, ID-83210, USA. Blair.Goates@ars.usda.gov"
Journal Title:Can J Microbiol
Year:2009
Volume:55
Issue:2
Page Number:203 - 206
DOI: 10.1139/w08-104
ISSN/ISBN:0008-4166 (Print) 0008-4166 (Linking)
Abstract:"Volatile organic compounds produced by the fungus Muscodor albus inhibit or kill numerous fungi. The effect of these volatiles was tested on dormant and physiologically active teliospores of the smut fungi Tilletia horrida, Tilletia indica, and Tilletia tritici, which cause kernel smut of rice, Karnal bunt of wheat, and common bunt of wheat, respectively. Reactivated rye grain culture of M. albus was used to fumigate dormant teliospores in dry Petri dishes and physiologically active teliospores on water agar for up to 5 days at 22 degrees C. Teliospores of all 3 species were incapable of germination when fumigated on agar for 5 days. When T. tritici on agar was fumigated only during the initial 48 h of incubation, viability was reduced by 73%-99%. Fumigation of dry loose teliospores of T. tritici caused a 69%-97% loss in viability, whereas teliospores within intact sori were not affected. Dormant teliospores of T. horrida and T. indica were not affected by M. albus volatiles. It appears that M. albus has potential as a seed or soil treatment for controlling seedling-infecting smuts where infection is initiated by germinating teliospores prior to seedling emergence. The volatiles were not effective for postharvest control of teliospores under conditions used in these experiments"
Keywords:"Antifungal Agents/metabolism/*pharmacology Basidiomycota/*drug effects/physiology Microbial Viability/*drug effects Oryza/microbiology Plant Diseases/microbiology Spores, Fungal/*drug effects/physiology Triticum/microbiology Volatile Organic Compounds/met;"
Notes:"MedlineGoates, Blair J Mercier, Julien eng Canada 2009/03/20 Can J Microbiol. 2009 Feb; 55(2):203-6. doi: 10.1139/w08-104"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 25-09-2024