Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractAir biofilters for a mixture of organic gaseous pollutants: an approach for industrial applications    Next AbstractGenetic circuits that govern bisexual and unisexual reproduction in Cryptococcus neoformans »

Int Dent J


Title:The efficacy of two oral hygiene regimens in reducing oral malodour: a randomised clinical trial
Author(s):Feres M; Figueiredo LC; Faveri M; Guerra MC; Mateo LR; Stewart B; Williams M; Panagakos F;
Address:"Departament of Periodontology, Guarulhos University, Guarulhos, Brazil. LRM Statistical Consulting, LLC, West Orange, NJ, USA. Dental Clinic, Colgate - Palmolive Company, Piscataway, NJ, USA"
Journal Title:Int Dent J
Year:2015
Volume:20150924
Issue:6
Page Number:292 - 302
DOI: 10.1111/idj.12183
ISSN/ISBN:0020-6539 (Print) 1875-595X (Electronic) 0020-6539 (Linking)
Abstract:"OBJECTIVES: This study compared the efficacy of two oral hygiene regimens in reducing oral malodour and the proportions of bacterial species involved in the production of volatile sulphur compounds. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy subjects who participated in a halitosis-induction phase and achieved an organoleptic score of >/= 3.0 [time point 0 (T0)] randomised into two groups: brushing with regular fluoride toothpaste alone (control group) or brushing with regular fluoride toothpaste followed by rinsing with a 0.075% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouthwash (CPC group). Subjects followed their assigned oral hygiene regimen for 21 days. Then, they underwent an organoleptic examination and measurement of volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs) using a portable gas chromatograph, 12 hours after their last oral hygiene procedure (T1) and 4 hours after an on-site oral hygiene (T2). Microbiological samples (supragingival biofilm, tongue coating and saliva) were analysed using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridisation. RESULTS: Both therapies statistically significantly improved the organoleptic scores (P < 0.05), but the VSC levels and/or concentrations were reduced only in the CPC group (P < 0.05). In subjects rinsing with CPC, oral malodour scores were reduced by 49% at the 4-hour assessment (T2) compared with those not rinsing (P < 0.05). Red-complex pathogens were reduced more effectively in the CPC group than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Brushing followed by rinsing with a 0.075% CPC mouthwash provided statistically significantly greater reductions in oral malodour, measured organoleptically and instrumentally, and in the proportions of red-complex species when compared with brushing alone"
Keywords:"Adolescent Adult Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use Biofilms Cariostatic Agents/therapeutic use Cetylpyridinium/therapeutic use Chromatography, Gas/methods Dental Plaque/microbiology Female Fluorides/therapeutic use Halitosis/microbiology/*preve;"
Notes:"MedlineFeres, Magda Figueiredo, Luciene Cristina Faveri, Marcelo Guerra, Marcelo C Mateo, Luis R Stewart, Bernal Williams, Malcolm Panagakos, Foti eng Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2015/09/26 Int Dent J. 2015 Dec; 65(6):292-302. doi: 10.1111/idj.12183. Epub 2015 Sep 24"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 04-07-2024