Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractBreathomics as a diagnostic tool for pulmonary embolism    Next AbstractExhaled breath analysis by electronic nose in airways disease. Established issues and key questions »

Clin Exp Allergy


Title:External validation of exhaled breath profiling using an electronic nose in the discrimination of asthma with fixed airways obstruction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Author(s):Fens N; Roldaan AC; van der Schee MP; Boksem RJ; Zwinderman AH; Bel EH; Sterk PJ;
Address:"Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. N.Fens@amc.nl"
Journal Title:Clin Exp Allergy
Year:2011
Volume:20110707
Issue:10
Page Number:1371 - 1378
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03800.x
ISSN/ISBN:1365-2222 (Electronic) 0954-7894 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Fixed airflow limitation can be found both in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), posing a day-to-day diagnostic challenge. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the external validity of metabolomic analysis of exhaled air by electronic nose for distinguishing asthma and COPD in patients with fixed airways obstruction. METHODS: One hundred patients were included in a cross-sectional design: 60 asthma patients: 21 with fixed airways obstruction (fixed asthma), 39 with reversible airways obstruction (classic asthma) and 40 COPD patients (GOLD stages II-III). Standardized sampling of exhaled breath was performed and volatile organic compounds were captured using an electronic nose resulting in breathprints. External validity in newly recruited patients (validation sets) was tested using a previous and independent training set. Breathprints were analysed by principal component and canonical discriminant analysis and area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: External validity of breathprints showed 88% accuracy for distinguishing fixed asthma from COPD (AUC 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.00, sensitivity 85%, specificity 90%) and 83% for classic asthma (AUC 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-1.00, sensitivity 91%, specificity 90%) (both P<0.001). Discriminative accuracy was not confounded by current smoking. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: External validation of exhaled breath molecular profiling shows high accuracy in distinguishing asthma and COPD in newly recruited patients with fixed airways obstruction. Exhaled air analysis may therefore reduce misdiagnosis in obstructive airways diseases, potentially leading to more appropriate management"
Keywords:"Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Airway Obstruction/*diagnosis Asthma/*diagnosis/physiopathology Breath Tests/*instrumentation/methods Cross-Sectional Studies Diagnosis, Differential Exhalation Female Forced Expiratory Volume Humans Male Middle Age;"
Notes:"MedlineFens, N Roldaan, A C van der Schee, M P Boksem, R J Zwinderman, A H Bel, E H Sterk, P J eng Evaluation Study England 2011/07/08 Clin Exp Allergy. 2011 Oct; 41(10):1371-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03800.x. Epub 2011 Jul 7"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024