Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractRole of the ultrasonic vocalization of the female rat (Rattus norvegicus) in sexual behavior    Next AbstractSaw-toothed grain beetleOryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Silvanidae) : Antennal and behavioral responses to individual components and blends of aggregation pheromone »

Behav Neural Biol


Title:Sensory cues that elicit ultrasonic vocalizations in female rats (Rattus norvegicus)
Author(s):White NR; Colona LC; Barfield RJ;
Address:"Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903"
Journal Title:Behav Neural Biol
Year:1991
Volume:55
Issue:2
Page Number:154 - 165
DOI: 10.1016/0163-1047(91)80136-3
ISSN/ISBN:0163-1047 (Print) 0163-1047 (Linking)
Abstract:"Female rats emit ultrasonic vocalizations during copulation. Female vocalizations are associated with darting and other proceptive behavior. In addition, females frequently call while approaching the male. A series of experiments was undertaken to determine whether female rats emit ultrasonic vocalizations in response to other rats or to their odors. Females were exposed either to bedding soiled by males or females or to devocalized conspecifics separated from the subject by a barrier. Females vocalized more to male cues than to female cues, regardless of whether the odor cues were from soiled bedding or from a devocalized conspecific. In addition, subjects vocalized more when presented with a devocalized female rather than a neutral stimulus. Furthermore, devocalized adult males, separated by a barrier, were more effective than either devocalized castrated or juvenile males in eliciting vocalizations; in turn, castrates and juveniles were more effective than neutral stimuli. Female calling was likely induced by odors from the male. In one experiment, the female subject was positioned in such a way that she could neither see or touch the stimulus male. Presentation of tape-recorded male vocalizations did not affect calling by the female. Vocalizations emitted by females in response to male odors may attract males or may facilitate subsequent copulatory behavior by the male"
Keywords:"Animals Arousal/*physiology Chemoreceptor Cells/physiology Female Rats Sex Attractants/*physiology Sexual Behavior, Animal/*physiology Smell/*physiology Social Environment Ultrasonics Vocalization, Animal/*physiology;"
Notes:"MedlineWhite, N R Colona, L C Barfield, R J eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 1991/03/01 Behav Neural Biol. 1991 Mar; 55(2):154-65. doi: 10.1016/0163-1047(91)80136-3"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024