Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractCascading effects of N input on tritrophic (plant-aphid-parasitoid) interactions    Next Abstract"Comparison of the key aroma compounds in organically grown, raw West-African peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) and in ground, pan-roasted meal produced thereof" »

Am J Bot


Title:Geographic divergence in floral morphology and scent in Linanthus dichotomus (Polemoniaceae)
Author(s):Chess SK; Raguso RA; Lebuhn G;
Address:"San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, California 94132 USA"
Journal Title:Am J Bot
Year:2008
Volume:95
Issue:12
Page Number:1652 - 1659
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0800118
ISSN/ISBN:0002-9122 (Print) 0002-9122 (Linking)
Abstract:"Floral reproductive morphology and scent are of primary importance to pollinators in guiding foraging decisions. We compared the floral scent and reproductive morphology between two subspecies of Linanthus dichotomus (Polemoniaceae) that are taxonomically distinguished by geography and flowering time: the vespertine L. dichotomus subsp. dichotomus and the diurnal L. dichotomus subsp. meridianus. Disparity in flowering time between the two subspecies is accompanied by differences in flower visitors. We collected floral volatiles using dynamic headspace methods and analyzed them using gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy. Together, the subspecies produced a total of 39 floral scent compounds. Subspecies differ in the quantitative pattern of volatiles that attract noctuid moths (e.g., lilac aldehydes) vs. a more general suite of visitors (e.g., phenylacetaldehyde), but not in overall scent emission rates. A discriminant function analysis correctly distinguished between the two subspecies based on scent samples 86% of the time. We measured seven reproductive morphological traits; a discriminant function analysis distinguished between the two subspecies based on morphological samples 81% of the time. We found significant differences between subspecies in scent but not in individual morphological traits. The evidence presented here is most consistent with a hypothesis of pollinator-mediated selection"
Keywords:
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEChess, Sally K R Raguso, Robert A Lebuhn, Gretchen eng 2008/12/01 Am J Bot. 2008 Dec; 95(12):1652-9. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800118"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 23-09-2024