Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractSexual behavior ofMatsucoccus josephi (Homoptera: Margarodidae) : Asynchronous adult male emergence and release of female sex pheromone    Next AbstractSynthesis and structure-activity relationship of diene modified analogs of Matsucoccus sex pheromones »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Outdoor attractancy of males ofMatsucoccus josephi (Homoptera: Matsucoccidae) andElatophilus hebraicus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) to synthetic female sex pheromone ofMatsucoccus josephi
Author(s):Mendel Z; Zegelman L; Hassner A; Assael F; Harel M; Tam S; Dunkelblum E;
Address:"Institute of Plant Protection, ARO, The Volcani Center, 50250, Bet Dagan, Israel"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:1995
Volume:21
Issue:3
Page Number:331 - 341
DOI: 10.1007/BF02036721
ISSN/ISBN:0098-0331 (Print) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"The active component of the sex pheromone ofMatsucoccus josephi is (2E,6E,8E)-5,7-dimethyl-2,6,8-decatrien-4-one; the chemical is also a powerful kairomone of adult males and females of the bugElatophilus hebraicus the principal predator ofM. josephi. The presence of theZ isomer (2E,6Z,8E)-5,7-dimethyl-2,6,8-decatrien-4-one does not interfere with the attractancy of the activeE component forM. josephi males or the bug. Our results show a clear dose-response between trap catch ofM. josephi males andE. hebraicus. Conversely, increasing amounts of theZ isomer in the mixture did not affect the attraction of the scale insect males or the bug. The catch ofM. josephi males did not differ significantly among traps of different color, and was significantly higher with traps attached to the tree trunk than those suspended between trees. Comparison of the catch ofM. josephi among the three forests and between pine species suggests that the level of infestation ofPinus halepepsis andPinus brutia ssp.brutia is similar, despite the fact that the latter pine is resistant to the scale insect. Both sexes ofE. hebraicus were trapped in much lower numbers at the more infested sites. This may be related to interference with the activity ofE. hebraicus due to deterioration and drying of parts of the tree crowns and heavy colonization by generalist predators in injured trees"
Keywords:
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEMendel, Z Zegelman, L Hassner, A Assael, F Harel, M Tam, S Dunkelblum, E eng 1995/03/01 J Chem Ecol. 1995 Mar; 21(3):331-41. doi: 10.1007/BF02036721"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 24-09-2024