Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Identification and linkage mapping of the genes for the putative homeodomain protein (hox1) and the putative pheromone receptor protein homologue (rcb1) in a bipolar basidiomycete, Pholiota nameko"    Next AbstractOdor-contributing volatile compounds of wild edible Nordic mushrooms analyzed with HS-SPME-GC-MS and HS-SPME-GC-O/FID »

Membranes (Basel)


Title:Groundwater Remediation of Volatile Organic Compounds Using Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membranes-A Field Study
Author(s):Ainscough TJ; Oatley-Radcliffe DL; Barron AR;
Address:"Energy Safety Research Institute (ESRI), Bay Campus, Swansea University, Fabian Way, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK. Centre for Water Advanced Technologies and Environmental Research (CWATER), College of Engineering, Bay Campus, Swansea University, Fabian Way, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK. Department of Chemistry and Department of Materials Science and Nanoengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA. Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Brunei, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong BE1410, Brunei"
Journal Title:Membranes (Basel)
Year:2021
Volume:20210116
Issue:1
Page Number: -
DOI: 10.3390/membranes11010061
ISSN/ISBN:2077-0375 (Print) 2077-0375 (Electronic) 2077-0375 (Linking)
Abstract:"Groundwater contamination by chlorinated hydrocarbons represents a particularly difficult separation to achieve and very little is published on the subject. In this paper, we explore the potential for the removal of chlorinated volatile and non-volatile organics from a site in Bedfordshire UK. The compounds of interest include trichloroethylene (TCE), tetrachloroethylene (PCE), cis-1,2-dichloroethylene (DCE), 2,2-dichloropropane (DCP) and vinyl chloride (VC). The separations were first tested in the laboratory. Microfiltration membranes were of no use in this separation. Nanofiltration membranes performed well and rejections of 70-93% were observed for synthetic solutions and up to 100% for real groundwater samples. Site trials were limited by space and power availability, which resulted in a maximum operating pressure of only 3 bar. Under these conditions, the nanofiltration membrane removed organic materials, but failed to remove VOCs to any significant extent. Initial results with a reverse osmosis membrane were positive, with 93% removal of the VOCs. However, subsequent samples taken demonstrated little removal. Several hypotheses were presented to explain this behavior and the most likely cause of the issue was fouling leading to adsorption of the VOCs onto the membrane and allowing passage through the membrane matrix"
Keywords:Voc groundwater nanofiltration reclamation;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEAinscough, Thomas J Oatley-Radcliffe, Darren L Barron, Andrew R eng Switzerland 2021/01/21 Membranes (Basel). 2021 Jan 16; 11(1):61. doi: 10.3390/membranes11010061"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024