Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractThe rhinophores sense pheromones regulating multiple behaviors in Aplysia fasciata    Next AbstractSoil sampling and analysis for volatile organic compounds »

Am J Phys Anthropol


Title:Sex differences in scent-marking in sifaka: Mating conflict or male services?
Author(s):Lewis RJ;
Address:"Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. rjlewis@mail.utexas.edu"
Journal Title:Am J Phys Anthropol
Year:2005
Volume:128
Issue:2
Page Number:389 - 398
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20206
ISSN/ISBN:0002-9483 (Print) 0002-9483 (Linking)
Abstract:"Male and female interests can either be in conflict or serve as a basis for exchange. Communication is thus an important aspect of intersexual relationships. Verreaux's sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi), like many prosimians, uses chemical signals as one form of communication. The goals of this study were to determine 1) if males and females exhibit sex differences in their scent-marking behavior, and 2) if scent-marking is an example of mating conflict or cooperation. All occurrences of scent-marks, scent-mark context, and scent-mark style were collected on 23 sifaka in the Kirindy Forest of western Madagascar for 7 months (September 2001-March 2002). Scent-mark rates were collected using continuous focal animal sampling from November 2000-March 2002. Home-range data were collected using monthly censuses and instantaneous focal sampling throughout those 17 months. The pressures of behavioral ecology seem to have shaped scent-marking in sifaka: the sexes exhibited significantly different scent-marking behavior. Results from this study are consistent with the hypotheses that 1) females scent-mark to advertise their presence and mark their resources, 2) clean-chested males use scent-marks as between-group communication to advertise their presence, and 3) stained-chested males use scent-marks as a form of olfactory mate-guarding. Scent-marking does not appear to be a 'service' that males provide to females, because overmarking limits female communication rather than adding to the overall number of scent-marks. Scent-marking behavior is a crucial aspect of the mating conflict and for understanding intersexual relationships in sifaka"
Keywords:"*Animal Communication Animals Conflict, Psychological Female Madagascar Male *Sex Attractants *Sex Characteristics Sexual Behavior, Animal/*physiology Strepsirhini/*physiology Territoriality;"
Notes:"MedlineLewis, Rebecca J eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 2005/03/30 Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005 Oct; 128(2):389-98. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20206"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024