Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractPhotosensitized degradation kinetics of trace halogenated contaminants in natural waters using membrane introduction mass spectrometry as an in situ reaction monitor    Next AbstractPolyphenolic allelochemicals from the aquatic angiosperm Myriophyllum spicatum inhibit photosystem II »

BMC Microbiol


Title:Rumen microbial and fermentation characteristics are affected differently by bacterial probiotic supplementation during induced lactic and subacute acidosis in sheep
Author(s):Lettat A; Noziere P; Silberberg M; Morgavi DP; Berger C; Martin C;
Address:"INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, Centre de Recherches de Clermont-Ferrand/Theix, F-63122 Saint Genes, Champanelle, France"
Journal Title:BMC Microbiol
Year:2012
Volume:20120719
Issue:
Page Number:142 -
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-142
ISSN/ISBN:1471-2180 (Electronic) 1471-2180 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Ruminal disbiosis induced by feeding is the cause of ruminal acidosis, a digestive disorder prevalent in high-producing ruminants. Because probiotic microorganisms can modulate the gastrointestinal microbiota, propionibacteria- and lactobacilli-based probiotics were tested for their effectiveness in preventing different forms of acidosis. RESULTS: Lactic acidosis, butyric and propionic subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) were induced by feed chalenges in three groups of four wethers intraruminally dosed with wheat, corn or beet pulp. In each group, wethers were either not supplemented (C) or supplemented with Propionibacterium P63 alone (P) or combined with L. plantarum (Lp + P) or L. rhamnosus (Lr + P). Compared with C, all the probiotics stimulated lactobacilli proliferation, which reached up to 25% of total bacteria during wheat-induced lactic acidosis. This induced a large increase in lactate concentration, which decreased ruminal pH. During the corn-induced butyric SARA, Lp + P decreased Prevotella spp. proportion with a concomitant decrease in microbial amylase activity and total volatile fatty acids concentration, and an increase in xylanase activity and pH. Relative to the beet pulp-induced propionic SARA, P and Lr + P improved ruminal pH without affecting the microbial or fermentation characteristics. Regardless of acidosis type, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis revealed that probiotic supplementations modified the bacterial community structure. CONCLUSION: This work showed that the effectiveness of the bacterial probiotics tested depended on the acidosis type. Although these probiotics were ineffective in lactic acidosis because of a deeply disturbed rumen microbiota, some of the probiotics tested may be useful to minimize the occurrence of butyric and propionic SARA in sheep. However, their modes of action need to be further investigated"
Keywords:Acidosis/prevention & control/*veterinary Animals Beta vulgaris Diet/*methods Fermentation Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus/physiology Probiotics/*administration & dosage Propionibacterium/physiology Rumen/*microbiology/physiopathology Sheep Sheep Diseases/*p;
Notes:"MedlineLettat, Abderzak Noziere, Pierre Silberberg, Mathieu Morgavi, Diego P Berger, Claudette Martin, Cecile eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2012/07/21 BMC Microbiol. 2012 Jul 19; 12:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-142"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024