Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractTargeted breath analysis: exogenous volatile organic compounds (EVOC) as metabolic pathway-specific probes    Next AbstractReal-Time Breath Analysis Reveals Specific Metabolic Signatures of COPD Exacerbations »

Chemosphere


Title:Packing material formulation for odorous emission biofiltration
Author(s):Gaudin F; Andres Y; Le Cloirec P;
Address:"Ecole des Mines de Nantes, GEPEA UMR CNRS 6144, 4 rue Alfred Kastler, BP 20722, 44307 Nantes Cedex 3, France"
Journal Title:Chemosphere
Year:2008
Volume:20070921
Issue:6
Page Number:958 - 966
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.08.014
ISSN/ISBN:0045-6535 (Print) 0045-6535 (Linking)
Abstract:"In biological gas treatment, like biofiltration of volatile organic compounds or odorous substances, the microbial nutritional needs could be a key factor of the process. The aim of this work is to propose a new packing material able to provide the lacking nutrients. In the first part of this study, two kinds of material composed of calcium carbonate, an organic binder and two different nitrogen sources, ammonium phosphate and urea phosphate (UP), were compared. The new supports present bulk densities between 0.88 and 1.15g cm(-3), moisture retention capacities close to 50% and 70%, and water cohesion capacities greater than six months for the material with 20% binder. In the second part, oxygen consumption measurements in liquid experiments show that these packing materials could enhance bacterial growth compared to pine bark or pozzolan and have no inhibitory effect. The biodegradation of different substrates (sodium sulfide and ammonia) and the support colonization by the biomass were evaluated. Finally, UP 20 was chosen and tested in a hydrogen sulfide or ammoniac biofiltration process. This showed that, for H2S concentrations greater than 100mg m(-3), UP 20 has a real advantage over pine bark or pozzolan"
Keywords:"Air Microbiology Air Pollutants/chemistry/*isolation & purification/metabolism Air Pollution/*prevention & control Ammonia/chemistry/isolation & purification/metabolism Biodegradation, Environmental Bioreactors Filtration/methods Sulfides/chemistry/isolat;"
Notes:"MedlineGaudin, Francois Andres, Yves Le Cloirec, Pierre eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2007/09/25 Chemosphere. 2008 Jan; 70(6):958-66. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.08.014. Epub 2007 Sep 21"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024