Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDevelopment of breath test for pneumoconiosis: a case-control study    Next AbstractAccuracy of the Electronic Nose Breath Tests in Clinical Application: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis »

J Breath Res


Title:Diagnostic accuracy of breath tests for pneumoconiosis using an electronic nose
Author(s):Yang HY; Peng HY; Chang CJ; Chen PC;
Address:"Institute of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene, National Taiwan University College of Public Health, Taipei, Taiwan. Department of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Public Health, Taipei, Taiwan. Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan"
Journal Title:J Breath Res
Year:2017
Volume:20171129
Issue:1
Page Number:16001 -
DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/aa857d
ISSN/ISBN:1752-7163 (Electronic) 1752-7155 (Linking)
Abstract:"Breath analyses have attracted substantial attention as screens for occupational environmental lung disease. The objective of this study was to develop breath tests for pneumoconiosis by analysing volatile organic compounds using an electronic nose. A case-control study was designed. We screened 102 subjects from a cohort of stone workers. After excluding three subjects with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus and one subject with asthma, 98 subjects were enrolled, including 34 subjects with pneumoconiosis and 64 healthy controls. We analysed the subjects' breath using an electronic nose with 32 nanocomposite sensors. Data were randomly split into 80% for model building and 20% for validation. Using a linear discriminate analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were 67.9%, 88.0%, 80.8%, and 0.91, respectively, in the training set and 66.7%, 71.4%, 70.0%, and 0.86, respectively, in the test set. In subgroup analysis divided by smoking status, the AUROCs for current smokers, former smokers, and subjects who never smoked were 0.94, 0.93, and 0.99, respectively. In subgroup analysis divided by gender, the AUROCs for males and females were 0.95 and 0.99, respectively. Breath tests may have potential as a screen for pneumoconiosis. A multi-centre study is warranted, and the procedures must be standardized before clinical application"
Keywords:Aged Area Under Curve Breath Tests/*methods Case-Control Studies Discriminant Analysis *Electronic Nose Female Humans Male Middle Aged Pneumoconiosis/*diagnosis ROC Curve;
Notes:"MedlineYang, Hsiao-Yu Peng, Hsin-Yi Chang, Che-Jui Chen, Pau-Chung eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2017/08/11 J Breath Res. 2017 Nov 29; 12(1):016001. doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/aa857d"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024