Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractFunctional characterization of the interaction of Ste50p with Ste11p MAPKKK in Saccharomyces cerevisiae    Next AbstractAppling hydrolysis acidification-anoxic-oxic process in the treatment of petrochemical wastewater: From bench scale reactor to full scale wastewater treatment plant »

Integr Med Res


Title:"A comparison of volatile fractions obtained from Lonicera macranthoides via different extraction processes: ultrasound, microwave, Soxhlet extraction, hydrodistillation, and cold maceration"
Author(s):Wu C; Wang F; Liu J; Zou Y; Chen X;
Address:"College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. College of Pharmacy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China"
Journal Title:Integr Med Res
Year:2015
Volume:20150612
Issue:3
Page Number:171 - 177
DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2015.06.001
ISSN/ISBN:2213-4220 (Print) 2213-4239 (Electronic) 2213-4220 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Hydrodistillation has been traditionally used to extract volatile fraction in traditional Chinese medicine. However, with the development of Soxhlet extraction (SE), microwave (MW), ultrasound (US), and cold maceration (CM), hydrodistillation (HD) is being replaced to meet some practical requirements. In this study, we investigated the effect of the five methods on the volatile fraction extract of Lonicera macranthoides. METHODS: Volatile fraction from the flower buds of Lonicera macranthoides was obtained by using different extraction methods, HD, SE, MW, US, and CM. The compositions of volatile fraction were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometric and further compared among extraction methods. RESULTS: Extracts obtained by the five methods reveal the qualitative and quantitative diversity in their compositions, especially for the low-content compositions. According to the results, SE shows the great value in the research where the high molecular-mass compound is of primary interest, and MW offers a way for the isolation of specific compound like octadecadienoic acid and hexadecanoic acid. HD, US, and CM have the advantage over SE and MW for the integrity of the constituents, whereas the phenomenon of compound degradation seems not so serious in solvent extraction methods such as US or CM as HD. Additionally, US and CM show superiority over time or material saving and diversity of the constituent. CONCLUSION: HD is still the best choice for the pure volatile fraction without organic solvent pollution. However, when it comes to some specifically actual demands, it can be replaced by the four methods for the volatile fraction extraction process, especially for production of certain compound groups"
Keywords:Lonicera macranthoides extraction method hydrodistillation traditional Chinese medicine volatile fraction;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEWu, Chun Wang, Feng Liu, Jiang Zou, Yuanfeng Chen, Xingfu eng Netherlands 2015/09/01 Integr Med Res. 2015 Sep; 4(3):171-177. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 12"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024