Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractBreaking the cipher: ant eavesdropping on the variational trail pheromone of its termite prey    Next AbstractEffect of glycolysis and heat shock proteins on hypoxia adaptation of Tibetan sheep at different altitude »

J Chromatogr A


Title:An automated gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric method for the quantitative analysis of the odor-active molecules present in the vapors emanated from wine
Author(s):Wen Y; Lopez R; Ferreira V;
Address:"Laboratory for Flavor Analysis and Enology, Analytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Sciences, Aragon Institute of Agroalimentary Research (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza, E-50009, Zaragoza, Spain. Laboratory for Flavor Analysis and Enology, Analytical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Sciences, Aragon Institute of Agroalimentary Research (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza, E-50009, Zaragoza, Spain. Electronic address: riclopez@unizar.es"
Journal Title:J Chromatogr A
Year:2018
Volume:20171228
Issue:
Page Number:130 - 138
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.12.064
ISSN/ISBN:1873-3778 (Electronic) 0021-9673 (Linking)
Abstract:"An automated dynamic headspace (DHS) method combined with thermal desorption (TD) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) has been developed and applied to characterize the composition of the vapors emanating from wine during its consumption. The method provides a snapshot of the contents in the wine vapors of up to 40 relevant aroma compounds, including methanethiol, sulfur dioxide, aldehydes, fusel alcohols or volatile phenols. Leaving aside methanethiol, method repeatability was better than 15%, and better than 11% in 30 cases. Determination coefficients were better than 0.99 and detection limits, ranging from 0.1 to 1200?ª+mug/L, depending on the compound, were below normal ranges of occurrence or odor thresholds of those 40 compounds. The method has been applied to assess the changes in the wine headspaces with time, monitoring the levels of 34 odorants emitted to the headspace by 4 different wines during five consecutive time points. Levels of 15 polar aroma compounds remained constant, while levels of 14 non-polar and highly volatile compounds decayed very fast, which should have strong sensory changes in the odor perceived. The trends followed by methanethiol, dimethyl sulfide, ethyl decanoate, by aldehydes and dicarbonyls were significantly related to the wine, which suggests that prediction of the aroma impact in these cases should include an estimation of the odorant x wine matrix interaction"
Keywords:Aldehydes/analysis/chemistry Automation *Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Gases/chemistry Limit of Detection Odorants/*analysis Sulfhydryl Compounds/analysis/chemistry Sulfur Dioxide/analysis/chemistry Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis/chemistry Win;
Notes:"MedlineWen, Yan Lopez, Ricardo Ferreira, Vicente eng Netherlands 2018/01/08 J Chromatogr A. 2018 Jan 26; 1534:130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.12.064. Epub 2017 Dec 28"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024