Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Effects of air exposure, temperature and additives on fermentation characteristics, yeast count, aerobic stability and volatile organic compounds in corn silage"    Next AbstractIdentification of Chaoborus kairomone chemicals that induce defences in Daphnia »

Arch Anim Nutr


Title:Formation of volatile organic compounds during the fermentation of maize as affected by sealing time and silage additive use
Author(s):Weiss K; Kroschewski B; Auerbach H;
Address:"Faculty of Life Science, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. International Silage Consultancy (ISC), Wettin-Lobejun, Germany"
Journal Title:Arch Anim Nutr
Year:2020
Volume:20191218
Issue:2
Page Number:150 - 163
DOI: 10.1080/1745039X.2019.1694357
ISSN/ISBN:1477-2817 (Electronic) 1477-2817 (Linking)
Abstract:"The study investigated the production of volatile organic compounds during the fermentation of maize containing 26.8% dry matter (DM). Forage was ensiled without additive or treated with 2 ml/kg of a chemical silage additive (SA) containing per litre 257 g sodium benzoate, 134 g potassium sorbate and 57 g ammonium propionate, and either sealed immediately or with a delay of 24 h. During the fermentation process, DM-losses, fermentation pattern (including ethyl lactate [EL] and ethyl acetate [EA]) and yeast numbers were determined. Delayed sealing and no SA resulted in highest DM losses with significant interactions between sealing time (ST) and SA on all sampling days (p < 0.001). The effects on organic acid production were variable depending on storage length. Ethanol production was affected by ST and SA, but promptly sealed silage treated with SA had consistently the lowest concentrations. Higher ethanol content during fermentation was associated with higher DM losses, as reflected by a strongly linear, positive relationship (R(2) = 0.70, p < 0.001). Compared with promptly sealed silage, the counts of yeasts were higher after delayed sealing during the first 7 d of storage (p < 0.001). Moreover, SA reduced yeast numbers compared with untreated silage (p < 0.01). EL concentrations increased throughout storage, whereas EA acetate accumulation was very rapid and intense already during the early stages of fermentation and peaked on d 34. The differences in concentrations and accumulation pattern between EL and EA, especially during the early fermentation phases, make evident that their synthesis was facilitated by different pathways and reactions, respectively"
Keywords:Acetic Acid/metabolism Esters/*metabolism Ethanol/metabolism *Fermentation Lactic Acid/metabolism Silage/*analysis Volatile Organic Compounds/*agonists Yeasts/*metabolism Zea mays/*chemistry Ensiling esters ethanol fermentation products maize silage addit;
Notes:"MedlineWeiss, Kirsten Kroschewski, Barbel Auerbach, Horst eng England 2019/12/19 Arch Anim Nutr. 2020 Apr; 74(2):150-163. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2019.1694357. Epub 2019 Dec 18"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024