Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractFloral odour and reproductive isolation in two species of Silene    Next AbstractHigh-Intensity Ultrasound to Improve Physical and Functional Properties of Lipids »

BMC Evol Biol


Title:How to be an attractive male: floral dimorphism and attractiveness to pollinators in a dioecious plant
Author(s):Waelti MO; Page PA; Widmer A; Schiestl FP;
Address:"Plant Ecological Genetics, Institute of Systematic Botany, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Marc.Waelti@tecan.com"
Journal Title:BMC Evol Biol
Year:2009
Volume:20090806
Issue:
Page Number:190 -
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-190
ISSN/ISBN:1471-2148 (Electronic) 1471-2148 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Sexual selection theory predicts that males are limited in their reproductive success by access to mates, whereas females are more limited by resources. In animal-pollinated plants, attraction of pollinators and successful pollination is crucial for reproductive success. In dioecious plant species, males should thus be selected to increase their attractiveness to pollinators by investing more than females in floral traits that enhance pollinator visitation. We tested the prediction of higher attractiveness of male flowers in the dioecious, moth-pollinated herb Silene latifolia, by investigating floral signals (floral display and fragrance) and conducting behavioral experiments with the pollinator-moth, Hadena bicruris. RESULTS: As found in previous studies, male plants produced more but smaller flowers. Male flowers, however, emitted significantly larger amounts of scent than female flowers, especially of the pollinator-attracting compounds. In behavioral tests we showed that naive pollinator-moths preferred male over female flowers, but this preference was only significant for male moths. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest the evolution of dimorphic floral signals is shaped by sexual selection and pollinator preferences, causing sexual conflict in both plants and pollinators"
Keywords:"Animals Behavior, Animal Flowers/anatomy & histology/*chemistry Male *Moths Odorants *Pollination Silene/*chemistry/physiology;"
Notes:"MedlineWaelti, Marc O Page, Paul A Widmer, Alex Schiestl, Florian P eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2009/08/08 BMC Evol Biol. 2009 Aug 6; 9:190. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-190"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024