Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractMethylated sulfur compounds in microbial mats: in situ concentrations and metabolism by a colorless sulfur bacterium    Next AbstractOlfactory coding in the perception of semiochemicals »

Environ Microbiol


Title:Dimethyl sulphide and methanethiol formation in microbial mats: potential pathways for biogenic signatures
Author(s):Visscher PT; Baumgartner LK; Buckley DH; Rogers DR; Hogan ME; Raleigh CD; Turk KA; Des Marais DJ;
Address:"Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340, USA. pieter.visscher@uconn.edu"
Journal Title:Environ Microbiol
Year:2003
Volume:5
Issue:4
Page Number:296 - 308
DOI: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00418.x
ISSN/ISBN:1462-2912 (Print) 1462-2912 (Linking)
Abstract:"Mechanisms of dimethyl sulphide (DMS) and methanethiol (MT) production and consumption were determined in moderately hypersaline mats, Guerrero Negro, Mexico. Biological pathways regulated the net flux of DMS and MT as revealed by increases in flux resulting from decreased salinity, increased temperature and the removal of oxygen. Dimethylsulphoniopropionate (DMSP) was not present in these microbial mats and DMS and MT are probably formed by the reaction of photosynthetically produced low-molecular weight organic carbon and biogenic hydrogen sulphide derived from sulphate reduction. These observations provide an alternative to the notion that DMSP or S-containing amino acids are the dominant precursors of DMS in intertidal sediment systems. The major sink for DMS in the microbial mats was biological consumption, whereas photochemical oxidation to dimethylsulphoxide was the major sink for DMS in the overlying water column. Diel flux measurements demonstrated that significantly more DMS is released from the system during the night than during the day. The major consumers of DMS in the presence of oxygen were monooxygenase-utilizing bacteria, whereas under anoxic conditions, DMS was predominantly consumed by sulphate-reducing bacteria and methanethiol was consumed by methanogenic bacteria. Aerobic and anaerobic consumption rates of DMS were nearly identical. Mass balance estimates suggest that the consumption in the water column is likely to be smaller than net the flux from the mats. Volatile organic sulphur compounds are thus indicators of high rates of carbon fixation and sulphate reduction in these laminated sediment ecosystems, and atmospheric sulphur can be generated as a biogenic signature of the microbial mat community"
Keywords:Bacteria/*metabolism Carbon/chemistry/metabolism *Ecosystem Oxygen/metabolism Sulfhydryl Compounds/*metabolism Sulfides/*metabolism Sulfur/metabolism Temperature Water Microbiology;
Notes:"MedlineVisscher, Pieter T Baumgartner, Laura K Buckley, Daniel H Rogers, Daniel R Hogan, Mary E Raleigh, Christopher D Turk, Kendra A Des Marais, David J eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. England 2003/03/29 Environ Microbiol. 2003 Apr; 5(4):296-308. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00418.x"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024