Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEnhancing mixed toluene and formaldehyde pollutant removal by Zamioculcas zamiifolia combined with Sansevieria trifasciata and its CO(2) emission    Next AbstractAssessment of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the Himalayan Riverine Network of Azad Jammu and Kashmir »

Insects


Title:"Invasion, Distribution, Monitoring and Farmers Perception of Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) and Farm-Level Management Practices in Bangladesh"
Author(s):Ullah MS; Sharmin D; Tumpa TA; Rashed M; Mondal P; Akram MW; Chowdhury S; Ahmad M; Gotoh T; Chaudhary M;
Address:"Laboratory of Applied Entomology and Acarology, Department of Entomology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh. National Pest Management Expert, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Dhaka 1213, Bangladesh. Faculty of Economics, Ryutsu Keizai University, Ryugasaki 301-8555, Ibaraki, Japan. Asia Regional Coordinator-Plantwise, CABI, New Delhi 110012, India"
Journal Title:Insects
Year:2023
Volume:20230331
Issue:4
Page Number: -
DOI: 10.3390/insects14040343
ISSN/ISBN:2075-4450 (Print) 2075-4450 (Electronic) 2075-4450 (Linking)
Abstract:"Fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda, is a major pest of maize that was first detected in Bangladesh in 2018 and rapidly spread throughout the maize-growing areas. The presence of FAW was monitored using sex pheromone traps. Farmers' pest management practices were assessed through a questionnaire. The damage is most apparent in the early and late whorl stages. As the crop is grown mostly from November to April, both vegetative and reproductive growth stages remain vulnerable to extensive damage. The survey results showed that 100% of the farmers used pesticides for FAW control, 40.4% handpicked and crushed egg masses, 75.8% handpicked and crushed caterpillars, and only 5.4% used other techniques like applying ash/sand in the funnel of maize. Commonly used pesticides included Spinosad, Emamectin benzoate, Imidacloprid, and others. Thirty-four percent of farmers applied pesticides twice in a season and 48% applied pesticides three times in a season and 54% and 39% of farmers sprayed chemicals at 7-day and 15-day intervals, respectively. FAW causes an average economic loss of 37.7% in maize production without pesticides. Increased use of pesticides to control FAW poses hazards to human health, wildlife, and the environment, and is expensive. Therefore, well-tested agroecological practices and bio-control agents are needed for sustainable FAW management"
Keywords:economic analysis of pesticide use fall armyworm farmers perception integrated pest management invasive species transboundary pest;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEUllah, Mohammad Shaef Sharmin, Dilruba Tumpa, Toufica Ahmed Rashed, Md Tafsir Nur Nabi Mondal, Powlomee Akram, Md Wasim Chowdhury, Setu Ahmad, Masum Gotoh, Tetsuo Chaudhary, Malvika eng Switzerland 2023/04/27 Insects. 2023 Mar 31; 14(4):343. doi: 10.3390/insects14040343"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 23-09-2024