Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"A new C12 alcohol identified as a sex pheromone and a trail-following pheromone in termites: the diene (Z,Z)-dodeca-3,6-dien-1-ol"    Next AbstractGenetically engineered maize plants reveal distinct costs and benefits of constitutive volatile emissions in the field »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Direct and indirect plant defenses are not suppressed by endosymbionts of a specialist root herbivore
Author(s):Robert CA; Frank DL; Leach KA; Turlings TC; Hibbard BE; Erb M;
Address:"Laboratory for Fundamental and Applied Research in Chemical Ecology (FARCE), University of Neuchatel, Rue Emile Argand, 11, CH-2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2013
Volume:20130226
Issue:4
Page Number:507 - 515
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-013-0264-5
ISSN/ISBN:1573-1561 (Electronic) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"Insect endosymbionts influence many important metabolic and developmental processes of their host. It has been speculated that they may also help to manipulate and suppress plant defenses to the benefit of herbivores. Recently, endosymbionts of the root herbivore Diabrotica virgifera virgifera have been reported to suppress the induction of defensive transcripts in maize roots, which may explain the finding of another study that once attacked plants become more susceptible to subsequent D. v. virgifera attack. To test this hypothesis, we cured D. v. virgifera from its major endosymbiont Wolbachia and tested whether endosymbiont-free individuals elicit different defense responses in maize roots. The presence of Wolbachia did not alter the induction of defense marker genes and resistance in a susceptible maize hybrid and a resistant line. Furthermore, attacked maize plants emitted the same amount of (E)-beta-caryophyllene, a volatile signal that serves as foraging cue for both entomopathogenic nematodes and D. v. virgifera. Finally, the effectiveness of the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora to infest D. v. virgifera was not changed by curing the larvae from their endosymbionts. These results show that the defense mechanisms of maize are not affected by Wolbachia. Consequently, D. v. virgifera does not seem to derive any plant-defense mediated benefits from its major endosymbiont"
Keywords:"Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology Coleoptera/drug effects/growth & development/*physiology Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Herbivory/drug effects Larva/physiology Nematoda/drug effects/physiology Plant Roots/chemistry/metabolism/microbiology Po;"
Notes:"MedlineRobert, Christelle A M Frank, Daniel L Leach, Kristen A Turlings, Ted C J Hibbard, Bruce E Erb, Matthias eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2013/02/27 J Chem Ecol. 2013 Apr; 39(4):507-15. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0264-5. Epub 2013 Feb 26"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024