Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEradicating the large white butterfly from New Zealand eliminates a threat to endemic Brassicaceae    Next AbstractElevated concentrations of acetone and unidentified compounds in the breath of alcohol abusers »

J Breath Res


Title:Machine learning methods on exhaled volatile organic compounds for distinguishing COPD patients from healthy controls
Author(s):Phillips CO; Syed Y; Parthalain NM; Zwiggelaar R; Claypole TC; Lewis KE;
Address:"Welsh Centre for Printing and Coating, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK. c.o.phillips@swansea.ac.uk"
Journal Title:J Breath Res
Year:2012
Volume:20120704
Issue:3
Page Number:36003 -
DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/6/3/036003
ISSN/ISBN:1752-7163 (Electronic) 1752-7155 (Linking)
Abstract:"Exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have shown promise in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but studies have been limited by small sample size and potential confounders. An investigation was conducted in order to establish whether combinations of VOCs could identify COPD patients from age and BMI matched controls. Breath samples were collected from 119 stable COPD patients and 63 healthy controls. The samples were collected with a portable apparatus, and then assayed by gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy. Machine learning approaches were applied to the data and the automatically generated models were assessed using classification accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Cross-validation of the combinations correctly predicted the diagnosis in 79% of COPD patients and 64% of controls and an optimum area under the ROC curve of 0.82 was obtained. Comparison of current and ex smokers within the COPD group showed that smoking status was likely to affect the classification; with correct prediction of smoking status in 85% of COPD subjects. When current smokers were omitted from the analysis, prediction of COPD was similar at 78% but correct prediction of controls was increased to 74%. Applying different analytical methods to the largest group of subjects so far, suggests VOC analysis holds promise for diagnosing COPD but smoking status needs to be balanced"
Keywords:"Aged *Artificial Intelligence Breath Tests/*methods Chromatography, Gas Exhalation Female Humans Male Mass Spectrometry Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/*diagnosis/physiopathology Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis;"
Notes:"MedlinePhillips, Chris O Syed, Yasir Parthalain, Neil Mac Zwiggelaar, Reyer Claypole, Tim C Lewis, Keir E eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2012/07/05 J Breath Res. 2012 Sep; 6(3):036003. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/6/3/036003. Epub 2012 Jul 4"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 14-11-2024