Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractMachine learning in the clinical microbiology laboratory: has the time come for routine practice?    Next AbstractInfluence of processing on the volatile profile of strawberry spreads made with isomaltulose »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Do caterpillars secrete 'oral secretions'?
Author(s):Peiffer M; Felton GW;
Address:"Department of Entomology and Center for Chemical Ecology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2009
Volume:20090217
Issue:3
Page Number:326 - 335
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-009-9604-x
ISSN/ISBN:1573-1561 (Electronic) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"The oral secretions or regurgitant of caterpillars contain potent elicitors of plant induced responses. These elicitors are recognized by host plants to differentiate between simple mechanical injury and the presence of herbivores. In some cases, this level of recognition is highly specific. Despite the in-depth chemical characterization of these elicitors, little is known about the amounts delivered in regurgitant during feeding. In this study, we use a fluorescent dye to label regurgitant in order to visualize caterpillar regurgitation during feeding. The procedure is highly sensitive and allows us to visualize nanoliter amounts of regurgitant. We examined the propensity of larval Helicoverpa zea, Heliothis virescens, Spodoptera exigua, Spodoptera frugiperda, and Manduca sexta to regurgitate on various host plants. These species were selected because they have been among the most intensely studied in terms of elicitors. Our results indicate that most larvae did not regurgitate following a brief feeding bout ( approximately 10 min) during which they ate ca. 0.40 cm(2) of leaf. When larvae did regurgitate, it was typically less than 10 nl. This is several orders of magnitude less than is typically used in most studies on oral secretions. The frequency of regurgitation appears to vary depending upon the host plant. Larval H. zea are less likely to regurgitate when feeding on tomato leaves compared to corn mid-whorl tissue. Our results have importance in understanding the role of oral secretions in plant recognition of herbivory. Because caterpillars did not routinely regurgitate during feeding, it is likely that they avoid the elicitation of some plant defensive responses during most feeding bouts"
Keywords:Animals Feeding Behavior Fluorescent Dyes/chemistry Hydrazines/chemistry Larva/growth & development/physiology Manduca/physiology Moths/growth & development/*metabolism/physiology Plant Leaves/physiology Spodoptera/physiology;
Notes:"MedlinePeiffer, Michelle Felton, Gary W eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 2009/02/18 J Chem Ecol. 2009 Mar; 35(3):326-35. doi: 10.1007/s10886-009-9604-x. Epub 2009 Feb 17"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024