Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractA new design of electronic control unit involving microcontroller to determine important parameters for target species in forest    Next Abstract"Biochemistry, genetics and regulation of bacilysin biosynthesis and its significance more than an antibiotic" »

Environ Monit Assess


Title:Evaluation of electronic pheromone trap capture conditions for Ips sexdentatus with climatic and temporal factors
Author(s):Ozcan GE; Tabak HS;
Address:"Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forestry Engineering, Kastamonu University, 37150, Kastamonu, Turkey. goncaece@kastamonu.edu.tr. Institute of Science, Kastamonu University, Forest Engineering Program, 37150, Kastamonu, Turkey"
Journal Title:Environ Monit Assess
Year:2021
Volume:20210903
Issue:10
Page Number:625 -
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-021-09402-6
ISSN/ISBN:1573-2959 (Electronic) 0167-6369 (Linking)
Abstract:"Controlling forest pests to maintain the sustainability of forests and ecosystem balance is one of the interests of modern forestry. In the evaluation of damage risks associated with forest pests, pheromone traps attract attention by providing early warnings. With the development of these traps in line with modern technology, more reliable data are obtained; these data are important in the identification and planning of pest management. In this study, a pheromone trap with electronic control unit was tested under field conditions. The capture of adult Ips sexdentatus under natural conditions during 103 days of the flying period was evaluated; 97.2% of the beetles captured in the trap were the target species. The comparison of the number of beetles recorded by the trap and manual counts revealed that the trap worked with an error margin of approximately 4%. However, no statistically significant difference was noted between these two counting methods. During the study, 59% of the total beetles were captured between May 27 and June 25. The average temperature at the period of the capture was 20.09 degrees C, average humidity was 66%, and average wind speed was 2.9 m/s. Of the captures, 73.9% occurred in the temperature range of 15-24.9 degrees C, 61.1% occurred in humidity range of 61-90%, 89.6% occurred at a wind speed of 0.3-5.4 m/s, and 77.3% occurred within the period from sunrise to sunset. When these four parameters were evaluated together, the most strongly associated parameter was daylight, followed by temperature, wind speed, and humidity"
Keywords:Animals *Coleoptera Ecosystem Electronics Environmental Monitoring Insect Control Pheromones *Weevils Crimean pine Forest pest Pheromone monitoring Precision forestry Six-toothed bark beetle;
Notes:"MedlineOzcan, Gonca Ece Tabak, Hakan Sukru eng Netherlands 2021/09/05 Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Sep 3; 193(10):625. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09402-6"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024